Steward requests/Permissions/2016-01

Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive first created in January 2016, although the comments contained were likely posted before and after this date. See current discussion.

Tulsi Bhagat@mai.wikipedia

Maithili Wikipedia has a local discussion for request of permanent adminship for Tulsi Bhagat & got no argues while it being open for 3 weeks. However, a community need two user to be permanent admin as a minimum. Thus, This one is second admin-candidate. -- Bijay Chaurasia ((Msg here plz)) 05:27, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 17:09, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

बिप्लब आनन्द@mai.wikipedia

Maithili Wikipedia has a local discussion for request of permanent adminship for Biplab Anand as he had already been admin authorized for twelve months. Now of second admin-candidate, Kindly requesting permanent adminship. -- Bijay Chaurasia ((Msg here plz)) 05:36, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 17:09, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Bacria Andrei Catalin@ro.wikibooks

The consensus is obviously against the candidate. It's been over 2 weeks since the last comment. The discussion should be closed. --Winter^eu 07:30, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi Wintereu, you don't need a steward to close this. You can do this yourself, or ask another rowiki user to close it. Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 09:32, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

bokareis@got.wikipedia.org

As administrator of the Gothic wikipedia and contributor of several uncyclopedias, like the English, French one I 'd like to become an Admin of the Gothic one as it needs a clean-up. Several pages are unrelated to Gothic and need deletion and there currently is no active admin available Bokareis (talk) 15:58, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

You're already an admin on the Gothic Wikipedia. --Stryn (talk) 16:03, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

@Bokareis: please specify what did you want here or I will mark this as not done. --Stryn (talk) 11:29, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi Bokareis, uncyclopedia is not part of the Wikimedia group of projects (e.a. Wikipedia), but is instead part of "Wikia". To become admin on the Gothic uncyclopedia you have to ask on Wikia. Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 20:37, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Babanwalia@pa.wikipedia.org

Requesting permanent admin rights to continue working for the betterment of the project. Thanks! --Babanwalia (talk) 10:25, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 18:21, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Pxos@fiwikiversity

Three months is not enough for the gargantuan task. I know already that I need more time to sort things out using sysop tools at fi.wikiversity. Please extend the temporary adminship to last for six months from the original date (i.e. ending 28 May 2016) and remove the previous expiry date from SRAT. The local announcement has been open for more than a week now. --Pxos (talk) 22:39, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

It is almost five months until the expiration of your access. Please, make any extension request in May. Ruslik (talk) 18:08, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

The reasoning is false. The rights will expire in February. The community does not oppose this, so this is not a call that a steward can make. I'm being bold and have reversed the "not done" status, because this is simply an idiotic decision. --Pxos (talk) 19:41, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Quote: "For temporary adminship please state for how long and for which tasks you need it, and link to a local announcement." I have now realized that I need the right for at least six months as I'm the only active administrator and there are so much to do. I have also provided a link to the local announcement where I have informed the community about my wish to extend the period. --Pxos (talk) 20:03, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

You initial post was confusing - it was not clear what the date 28 May meant, although I do not want to call it "idiotic". Anyway it is a relatively long time until you temporal adminship expires, so, please, apply when it is close to the expiration. Ruslik (talk) 18:17, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

I simply cannot see the point in this "please apply later" thing. I have originally made a personal error of judgment, where I thought that three months would be sufficient. I asked the rights for three months and told the local community that I would like to be your man for 3 months. Now I have come to the conclusion that I have made an error in the amount of work that is ahead of me, and I have already told the community that I would like to keep the rights for six months. As I have reached the conclusion and met all the requirements, which I won't repeat here, I have decided to ask that the rights be kept for six months altogether. Now for some unwritten rule a single steward forces me to wait for 40 days, and only then can I make another request and perhaps make another announcement to the community. Please tell me where the policy is written that governs this procedure. --Pxos (talk) 20:18, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

 On hold until 28 February 2016. Ruslik (talk) 08:09, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Ok, this doesn't make any sense. I hereby withdraw the application altogether. Feel free to mark this as "not done" so that it won't appear here unnecessarily for almost two months. --Pxos (talk) 21:22, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

For the record, Stryn marked this as "not done". If I am to make a new request, I will do it in February. --Pxos (talk) 22:22, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Sfic@hiwiktonary

He is one of the most active user on Hindi communities.☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 19:39, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

On hold until 14 Jan. --MF-W 21:41, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

There is a local bureaucrat. You should contact them to grant the user requested rights. --Stryn (talk) 17:05, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Please ask the local bureaucrat at wikt:hi:सदस्य वार्ता:रोहित रावत. Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 07:28, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

•  Declined Please ask local bureaucrat or return if local bureaucrat is not active. -- Avi (talk) 23:17, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Pxos@fi.wikiquote

As a bureaucrat to fi.wikiquote, I'd like to request changing Pxos's current temporary administrator status to be permanent. That is, Steward_requests/Permissions/Approved_temporary#Expiring:_21_February_2016 could be removed. He has done a lot of useful work, there are only two other admins at fi-wikiquote at the moment and the active one of them (MiPe) is supporting Pxos's permanent status as seen on discussion page. (notably the one after-the-deadline opposer in the vote discussion is a new user with just that one edit) TJ (talk) 14:58, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Done - [1] - Taketa (talk) 18:07, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Konkani Wikipedia RFAs

Hello, there are two open RFAs at Konkani Wikipedia Village pump, both of these are open for more than 3 months now. Could you please have a look here? -- Tito Dutta (talk) 07:22, 18 January 2016 (UTC) (posted on a user talk page, moved for a steward's action)

Another request on same topic moved from here
There's a long pending request for sysop from one of the Konkani Wikipedians, check request here : Sysop request from Konknnimogi24 . Someone please take proper action and provide sysop permission for him.--Rahmanuddin (talk) 13:54, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, please, make a specific request of what you want us to do. Ruslik (talk) 20:12, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

• Hello User:Ruslik0, I want you to close these requests after determining whether there is a consensus that the person should be promoted. Regards. -- Tito Dutta (talk) 21:09, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

These two RFAs are for the same user? Ruslik (talk) 13:52, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

• No these two are two different users. This is of User:Konknni mogi 24 and ther second one is of User:Darshan kandolkar. -- Tito Dutta (talk) 15:00, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

As I asked before, please, make specific requests for each user. Ruslik (talk) 18:15, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

┌─────────┘
Thanks Ruslik for your reply, okay, I am making specific requests. There are 2 open RFA noms at Konkani Wikipedia (gom.wikipedia.org):

First RFA: User:Konknni mogi 24

RFA, started on 15 October 2015, Participation: 7 supports: I am requesting to close this RFA.

Done Ruslik (talk) 11:05, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Penn Station@jawiki

Penn Station had his rights removed solely because he had not signed the Confidentiality Agreement yet. He has now done so and so I'd love if a Steward could add the rights back :). Jalexander--WMF 08:07, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Done. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 08:17, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Arifys@map-bms.wikipedia

(Why I make this request? because I wanted to check out the new user who abuses his or her account and duplicate accounts. In map-bmswp my own, and no bureaucrat, but I am active at there. ) Thanks Arifys (talk) 15:18, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi Arifys, you need two candidates and a large community that supports you, before making a request for access here. Please read CheckUser policy#Appointing local Checkusers. If you have a specific request for a checkuser on map-bms.wikipedia, you can ask a steward to do this at Steward requests/Checkuser. Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 15:27, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Sadrettin@trwikipedia

Has now signed the Confidentiality Agreement and was removed (below) simply because of that. Can now be granted back.` Jalexander--WMF 23:53, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Done - Taketa (talk) 05:51, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Q-bit array@ru.wikipedia

According to the above Arbitration Committee decision, this user is appointed the CheckUser rights. Michgrig (talk) 21:46, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

 On hold, pending signature of the confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information (instructions). —MarcoAurelio 22:03, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Done. -- Q-bit array (talk) 12:11, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks. We will wait until your name appears at IN. Thanks for your patience. Best regards. —MarcoAurelio 17:11, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Done - [2] - Taketa (talk) 09:46, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Ле Лой@ru.wikipedia

According to the above Arbitration Committee decision, this user is appointed the CheckUser rights. Michgrig (talk) 21:46, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

 On hold, pending signature of the confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information (instructions). —MarcoAurelio 22:03, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Done. Ле Лой (talk) 03:44, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks. We will wait until your username appears at IN. Best regards, —MarcoAurelio 17:12, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Done - [3] - Taketa (talk) 09:47, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Sotiale@kowiki

Sotiale had their checkuser rights removed because they had not yet signed the new Confidentiality agreement. This has now been resolved and their name placed on the noticeboard. Please grant their rights back as an administrative re-grant. Jalexander--WMF 07:46, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Done - Taketa (talk) 10:37, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Penn Station@jawiki

Penn Station had his rights removed solely because he had not signed the Confidentiality Agreement yet. He has now done so and so I'd love if a Steward could add the rights back :). Jalexander--WMF 08:08, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Done. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 08:17, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Eclecticology@en.wiktionary

Please remove bureaucrat permission on English Wiktionary; the editor has not fulfilled the w:Wikipedia:Bureaucrats#Bureaucrat activity requirements and has been advised of the pending removal. With thanks to the editor for his past service. Stephen G. Brown (talk) 17:56, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Um, methinks you are linking the wrong project's inactivity policy...Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 18:08, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Regardless of any activity requirements, is wikt:Wiktionary:Votes/2015-11/Eclecticology for de-admin and de-bureaucratting not enough? The vote lasted a month and is unanimous. --Dan Polansky (talk) 19:15, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Done - Removed bureaucrat flag. Admin flag was locally removed - Taketa (talk) 15:53, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Ochilov@eo.wikiquote

Hi! Please remove my temporate adminship. I have done all maitanance work needed - deleting unnecessary categories and protecting some high-traffic pages. --Ochilov (talk) 21:36, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi Ochilov, when you requested the rights a week ago you said you wanted to have the rights so you have them if at any time it would be needed. You have temporary adminship until March, and it will be taken away then without any need for you to act, or it can be prolonged if needed. Are you sure you won't need the right anytime during the next two months. Are you sure you don't need temporary adminship anymore? Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 09:12, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Taketa, hi! I reguled to finish my work very fast :) I just want to finish my work everywhere where I have advanced permissions and remove these permissions so I could concentrate more in Esperanto Wikipedia, Meta-Wiki and some Outreach projects. If I will have a need of admin act in eowikiquote, I will ask KuboF. Regards, Ochilov (talk) 09:33, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Done. --Stryn (talk) 12:20, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Cheers!@Wikidata

Per policy. Less than five administrator actions during last six months. Stryn (talk) 00:26, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Done - Taketa (talk) 00:46, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Aced@global

Done - Taketa (talk) 15:40, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Seraphimblade@enwiki

The stewards are asked to remove both CU and OS from all of the outgoing arbitrators on 01 January except where explicitly noted above. For Seraphimblade that meant both CU and OS. Done by me. Trijnstel_talk 23:36, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Thryduulf@enwiki

The stewards are asked to remove both CU and OS from all of the outgoing arbitrators on 01 January except where explicitly noted above. For Thryduulf that meant only CU. Done by me. Trijnstel_talk 23:36, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Kate@mediawikiwiki

Nemo 00:06, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Done. Trijnstel_talk 00:12, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Allan Aguilar@eswikivoyage

The community of eswikivoyage has approved the new inactivity policy of sysops. Allan Aguilar has edits on principal namespace and project namespace until 17-nov-2014. Thanks in advance. White Master (es) 19:40, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Done, thanks for their work. Ajraddatz (talk) 03:41, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

PuzzletChung@ko.wikipedia

Please remove Checkuser status of this user by CheckUser policy, as he is not active in kowp for 1 year. --IRTC1015 07:36, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Done - Taketa (talk) 07:59, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Proger@az.wikipedia

Hi, I am a bureaucrat of Azerbaijani Wikipedia. And I ask you to desysop this user because of 1 year inactivity, since 23 December 2014 to 24 December 2015. We don't have internal rules regulating this issues, so according to relevant en-wiki rules he should be desysoped.--Sortilegus (talk) 20:56, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Why would En-wiki rules have any bearing on AzWiki? The better option would be for you to open a public discussion (at your version of the village pump or similar) about de-sysoping this person in particular, and about implementing activity rules in general. -- Avi (talk) 16:34, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Or wait until AAR applies automatically. —MarcoAurelio 15:16, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Not done. --MF-W 22:17, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Erdal_Ronahi@ku.wikipedia

Please remove administrator and bureaucrat access. The user has been inactive for a long time and there is a community consensus that the user's access should be removed. Thank you for your help, spas.— The preceding unsigned comment was added by MikaelF (talk)

Done. --MF-W 03:29, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Webmaster@ku.wikipedia

Please remove administrator access. The user has been inactive for a long time and there is a community consensus that the user's access should be removed. Thank you for your help, spas. — The preceding unsigned comment was added by MikaelF (talk)

Done. --MF-W 03:30, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Bablekan@ku.wikipedia

Please remove administrator access. The user has been inactive for a long time and there is a community majority consensus that the user's access should be removed. Thank you for your help, spas. — The preceding unsigned comment was added by MikaelF (talk)

Done. --MF-W 03:30, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

The boss@pl.wikipedia

Due to our policy, I hereby request removal of administrator access due to lack of administrative actions during a 1 year period. The user has been notified (https://pl.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dyskusja_wikipedysty:The_boss&diff=44393441&oldid=42813806). PG (talk) 09:59, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Done - Please thank them for their work - Taketa (talk) 10:14, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Grind24@wikimania2015

Please remove my administrator and translation administrator right. No standard pratice needed.--Grind24 (talk) 21:13, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Done. --MF-W 23:38, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Grind24@test.wikipedia

Please remove my translation administrator right. No standard pratice needed.--Grind24 (talk) 21:13, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Done. --MF-W 23:38, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Grind24@test.wikidata

Please remove my administrator and translation administrator right. No standard pratice needed.--Grind24 (talk) 21:13, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Done. --MF-W 23:38, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Mr. Pseudo@sqwikipedia

Not a cooperative admin. He is always arguing with other admins, threatening other users with blocks and blocking IPs even for months, without warnings.[4] --Olsi (talk) 01:48, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Done - Two week local vote shows clear consensus to remove. - Taketa (talk) 05:13, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

darkweasel94@eowikipedia

The admin did not edit for more than a year and by a local policy his rights should be nulled. The user is already have a notice in his talkpage and thanked for his work --Ochilov (talk) 15:17, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Done, einsbor _talk 16:03, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

PaulP@eowikipedia

The admin did not edit for more than a year and by a local policy his rights should be nulled. The user is already have a notice in his talkpage and thanked for his work --Ochilov (talk) 15:17, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Done, einsbor _talk 16:03, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Roboto de Marcos@eowikipedia

The admin-bot did not edit for more than a year and by a local policy his rights should be nulled. His owner is already have a notice in his talkpage and thanked for his work --Ochilov (talk) 15:17, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Done, I have removed only admin flag, bot status can be removed by local 'crat. einsbor _talk 16:03, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Einsbor, okay, thank you very much. We also have one 'crat who has 6 edits in two year. Should I open a local discussion? --Ochilov (talk) 16:22, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

As far as I understand your policy he is active enough to keep admin and crat flag, so they cannot be removed without clear local community consensus. At this point this case can be solved by the eowiki community. einsbor _talk 16:31, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Einsbor, thank you for explanation! I will start the discussion later :)

Removal of global rollback for FalconL

I haven't been active on the SWMT for quite a while and I'm not planning to re-join it in the near future, either. Please remove my global rollback permissions. (Sorry if this is the wrong place for such a request.) --FalconL ^?! 14:13, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Done, thanks for your past work, and hopefully we'll see you around sometime in the future! :) Ajraddatz (talk) 17:58, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

@Ajraddatz: Before it is forgotten, this request should probably be moved to SRP. At least all previous removal requests were made and archived over there. Though for some reason, OTRS member removals seem to be filed here on SRGP, unlike all other global right removal requests, so the consistency seems to be gone lately, anyway. --Vogone (talk) 10:17, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

DHN@global

No actions done within a year. Then, please remove his/her global rename right. Jmvkrecords ⚜ (Intra talk) 08:38, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Not done - 3 global renames in the last year. Taketa (talk) 09:06, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

4 Jun 2015 / 4 Jan 2015... Sorry, I have read it so fast... I apologize also to DHN, Jmvkrecords ⚜ (Intra talk) 09:19, 11 January 2016 (UTC).

Izvora@bgwikipedia

Please remove my administrator rights. Thanks and Regards --Izvora (talk) 18:27, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

 On hold for 1 day, standard for resignation of advanced permissions --Stryn (talk) 18:38, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Done, thanks for your service. --Stryn (talk) 20:35, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

MBisanz@enwiki

Posting this request in my official capacity as a clerk of the Arbitration Committee, Kharkiv07 (T) 20:55, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Done Thank you for the service. --Jyothis (talk) 21:14, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Confirming this as an Arb --In actu (talk) 21:17, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

@Jyothis: only MBisanz's CU was to be removed --In actu (talk) 21:22, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Corrected (uncontroversial). -- Avi (talk) 21:28, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks Avi :) --Jyothis (talk) 21:44, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Joe Decker@enwiki

Posting this request in my official capacity as a clerk of the Arbitration Committee, Kharkiv07 (T) 20:55, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Done Thank you for the service. --Jyothis (talk) 21:15, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Confirming this as an Arb --In actu (talk) 21:17, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Elfix@global

Please remove the steward access only. Thank you Elfix 20:56, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

(On hold for 24 hours) 20:56, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Done I also removed CU flag at loginwiki, einsbor _talk 20:56, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Kizar@eswikivoyage

Per new inactivity policy, Kizar has edits in principal namespace and project namespace until 16-ene-2015. Thanks in advance, White Master (es) 14:26, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Done. --Stryn (talk) 18:26, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Mathonius@global

I've decided to step down as a steward due to personal circumstances and time constraints. Please remove my account from the global Steward group, and remove my checkuser flag on loginwiki. Thanks in advance. Love, Mathonius (talk) 19:11, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Done, sad to see you go. Ajraddatz (talk) 19:22, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Elmondo21st@ar.wikipedia

due to inactivity (last time: 29 Jan 2015), according to our local policy (de-adminship): 6 months without admin activity, and we send message to his talk page and to his email, but no respond since 16 days --Ibrahim.ID »» 08:52, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

• Done Please thank Elmondo for his service. -- Avi (talk) 17:47, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

ناي@ar.wikipedia

due to inactivity (last time: 19 Jun 2015), according to our local policy (de-adminship): 6 months without admin activity, and we send message to her talk page and to her email, but no respond since 16 days --Ibrahim.ID »» 08:52, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

• Done Please thank ناي for his service. -- Avi (talk) 17:47, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Kevin Gorman@en.wikipedia

Per arbitration case remedy. Amortias (talk) 18:25, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

(Non-steward comment) Fairly sure this is a question for enwiki bureaucrats, which have the ability to do desysopping.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 18:29, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Done Done locally on EnWiki as EnWiki bureaucrat. -- Avi (talk) 18:32, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

FalconL@global

I haven't been active on the SWMT for quite a while and I'm not planning to re-join it in the near future, either. Please remove my global rollback permissions. (Sorry if this is the wrong place for such a request.) --FalconL ^?! 14:13, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Done, thanks for your past work, and hopefully we'll see you around sometime in the future! :) Ajraddatz (talk) 17:58, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

@Ajraddatz: Before it is forgotten, this request should probably be moved to SRP. At least all previous removal requests were made and archived over there. Though for some reason, OTRS member removals seem to be filed here on SRGP, unlike all other global right removal requests, so the consistency seems to be gone lately, anyway. --Vogone (talk) 10:17, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Lourdes Cardenal@es.wikipedia

I have decided to step down as sysop and bureaucrat on es.wp. Lourdes Cardenal (talk) 18:53, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

 On hold for 1 day, standard for resignation of advanced permissions --Stryn (talk) 18:55, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Please hold further. I'll contact the user. —MarcoAurelio 18:57, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Everything seems to be in order and looks like a meditated decission, sadly. @Lourdes Cardenal: ¿Quieres seguir manteniendo los permisos de supresión? No vas a poder hacer mucho con ellos sin los permisos de bibliotecario. // Do you wish to keep your oversight permissions? They ain't much useful without administrator permissions. Thanks. —MarcoAurelio 00:04, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Please, I would stick with the permission of suppressor Lourdes Cardenal (talk) 15:26, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Done, admin/crat permissions removed, oversight permissions left. Thank you so much for the huge ammount of work you did in this 10 years. Just in case, removal performed as uncontroversial self-request and in the understanding that eswiki is hardly my homewiki nowadays. —MarcoAurelio 15:40, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply. Waive permits suppressor because it is technically impossible Lourdes Cardenal (talk) 15:15, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Done as well. —MarcoAurelio 17:53, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Mvelam@ro.wikisource

I request removal of sysop rights for user Mvelam. He hasn't been active for more than a year. See also local policy here. Thanks. --Winter^eu 22:28, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Done - No edits in 6 months, and less than 50 edits in the a year. —MarcoAurelio 23:00, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Sabbe@da.wikipedia

Inactive administrator. --Simeon Dahl (talk) 09:16, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Done - As per local guideline, inactive for 6 months, 30 day notice. Please thank them for their work. - Taketa (talk) 10:30, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

I just want to say that the removal is against consensus about taking logs into account as edits. Please also see this request for removal of administrator rights. Regards --Asger (talk) 13:37, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Please elaborate Asger. The last log that I can see is from 22 June 2015 (an automatic patrol). Note that the last regular log is from January 2015, not 2016. Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 17:57, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Mimihitam@global

No actions done within a year. Then, please remove his/her global rename right. Jmvkrecords ⚜ (Intra talk) 18:35, 22 January 2016 (UTC).

Done - Taketa (talk) 20:37, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

GaiJin@kk.wiktionary

https://kk.wiktionary.org/wiki/%D0%A3%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8%D1%81%D3%A9%D0%B7%D0%B4%D1%96%D0%BA:%D2%9A%D0%B0%D1%83%D1%8B%D0%BC_%D0%BF%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BB%D1%8B#Inactive_admin - Per inactivity policy, user needs to be demoted. No edits or sysop actions since 2013. --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 02:57, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Dear Atcovi, where can we find the local admin inactivity policy? Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 05:52, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Since we don't have one ourselves.. I was referring to Meta's inactivity policy (if that's ok) --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 13:53, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

The Admin activity review is done on a yearly basis. So one time a year. If the admin is inactive this will be checked on that occasion. Unless there is a local policy this admin's activity will be reviewed during the yearly review. Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 15:58, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Alright... so if I make an inactivity policy right now. Would this user be demoted? --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 16:22, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

If that is right now supported by the local community, then yes. However, imposing a new local policy doesn't mean to just write it somewhere. It needs to be discussed, otherwise it's unlikely one of us will act upon it. -Barras talk 16:25, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

But there is no community. --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 16:59, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

rxy@jawiki

I have been granted temporary sysop rights for anti-vandalism urgent action. As per local-policy, please remove my sysop rights. Thanks. rxy (talk) 15:25, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Done. —MarcoAurelio 15:35, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

JenVan@global

Last edit in 05.02.2013--6AND5 (talk) 21:56, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

• Policy does not mention that inactive global rollbackers loose their permissions. Inactivity as a reason for global rollbackers was discussed 4 times with no consensus each of them. —MarcoAurelio 22:07, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
• Moved from SRGP. Request concerns the removal of global rollback permission. --Vogone (talk) 23:30, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

  Not sure why. There's no policy allowing us to do this, so the only way I see this could be done would be to (a) ask the user to resign the right or (b) open a vote of no confidence, the later one also being problematic because it is not written in policy either and inactivity can't hardly be considered a breach on a user confidence IMHO. —MarcoAurelio 14:32, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Not done - Nothing in the global rollback policy allows for a removal based on inactivity. Policy ought to be modified to do so. —MarcoAurelio 11:37, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Jorunn@global

Last edit in 12.04.2010--6AND5 (talk) 22:05, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

• Policy does not mention that inactive global rollbackers loose their permissions. Inactivity as a reason for global rollbackers was discussed 4 times with no consensus each of them. —MarcoAurelio 22:07, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Thanks dear Marco. Here we can vote for the individual user? For example, this user is not active for about 6 years.--6AND5 (talk) 22:18, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
• Moved from SRGP. Request concerns the removal of global rollback permission. --Vogone (talk) 23:30, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Not done per above. —MarcoAurelio 11:37, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Miss_Manzana@eswikipedia

I'm tired of being an admin on eswiki. I need rest. Thank you and regards. мιѕѕ мαηzαηα ✩ 14:39, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

 On hold for 24 hours per SOP on self-requests. -- Avi (talk) 17:25, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Done - Thank you for all your work as admin. - Taketa (talk) 18:19, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Ecelan@eswiktionary

The last edition of Ecelan in eswiktionary was in March 2013, and the last use of sysop tools was in 2008. I wrote a message two days ago, without response. The inactivity in eswiktionary is 2 years, and he surpassed the limit. Thanks Taichi - (あ！) 01:41, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Could you please point out the local inactivity policy? Thanks, RadiX∞ 02:15, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

@RadiX: Here. --Taichi - (あ！) 02:20, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

As I can see, in this page it is mentioned that "La comunidad de Wikcionario no tiene una política local para remover los privilegios de un administrador que ha permanecido inactivo durante mucho tiempo". So, this will be left up to the Admin activity review/2015. RadiX∞ 02:30, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

The community in eswiktionary approved via Village pump the Admin activity review in Meta as local measure. So, previously another sysops were desysoped using this measure. --Taichi - (あ！) 02:46, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Dear Taichi, the last admin activity review started back in Dec 2015 and the forthcoming actions should take place soon (according to steps described here). As for now, I will mark this request as not done. Thanks. RadiX∞ 02:54, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

kibele@trwikipedia

ı request removal of sysop access. thanks. --kibele 09:38, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

On hold for a day per standard practice --Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 09:43, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Done, einsbor _talk 17:53, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Mohammedbas@arwikipedia

Remove me from sysop group --albebas (talk) 12:37, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

 On hold - On hold for a day per standard practice. - Taketa (talk) 12:40, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Done, einsbor _talk 17:55, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

GVarnum-WMF@metawiki

GVarnum-WMF was granted temporary administrator and translation administrator rights by Jalexander-WMF until 31 Dec. 2015. Please remove his admin access as expired. Thank you. —MarcoAurelio 23:41, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks Marco, I actually intended to extend him indef (his contract was extended and he switched away from me to Comms where he's helping do a lot of work on meta) so I'd like for him to keep the rights. I've readded him to the list as indef. Jalexander--WMF 23:51, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Extended, in that case. Savh^ñ 23:54, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

And request withdrawn too. Thanks James. —MarcoAurelio 01:01, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

xqt@pdcwiki

At 7th time I would like to prolong my adminship at pdc-wiki when it expires this week. Since a long time I am the only active local sysop at his site. A local announcement has been started at w:pdc:Wikipedia:Gmeeschafts-Portal#Xqt as admin (7). Old announcements are listed in the archive. Thanks a lot.  @xqt 16:38, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

 On hold till 19th April--Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 17:10, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

 Granted for 1 year and 8 months to expire on 2015-12-31.

Thank you for your work, please keep up! --M/ (talk) 10:22, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

removed --Stryn (talk) 10:14, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Mogoeilor@lrc.wikipedia

He has been temp admin since lrcwiki was in incubator, please give him temp admin right for three months, thank you. Mjbmr (discussion • contribs) 07:11, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

In e-mail he asked me how to obtain adminship and I told him to please start a local request. --MF-W 10:07, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

He had created request for crat at lrc:ڤیکیپئدیا:چاست حوٙنە#دیڤوٙنسالاری کاریار موٙگوٙیی لۊر(Mogoeilor) but told them it's not possible to get a crat access for small wikis. I'm saying a wiki can't held without at least a local admin. Mjbmr (discussion • contribs) 01:28, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

It would be correct to say that stewards will consider adminship at this time, and it would be temporary adminship, which would then follow the normal pattern of increasing terms to a year in length.  — billinghurst sDrewth 03:33, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Indeed I was also asked by him about bureaucratship, but told him to seek adminship first. Sigh. --MF-W 19:46, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

could I be a admin of luri lrc for one year? please so thankslrc lori (talk) 14:50, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

 Granted for 6 months to expire on 2016-01-05. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. consensus w:lrc:Special:PermanentLink/24423  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:04, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
so thanks best wishes.lrc lori (talk) 13:42, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

 Removed Matanya (talk) 21:05, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

David Saroyan@hy.wikisource

Դավիթ Սարոյան (Davit Saroyan) is temporary administrator (6 month) in hy.wikisource. There is community consensus to continue as an administrator. -Beko (talk) 12:19, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

 Granted for 1 year to expire on 2016-01-06. --MF-W 21:09, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

removed --Stryn (talk) 11:26, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Babanwalia@pa.wiki

Requesting an extension for my admin rights at Punjabi wiki. Thanks! --Babanwalia (talk) 14:11, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

 On hold until 2 Jan — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Billinghurst (talk) 13:04, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

 Granted for 1 year to expire on 2016-01-02. --MF-W 17:02, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Granted a permanent adminship. Ruslik (talk) 18:22, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Extended to permanent adminship per above. —MarcoAurelio 15:15, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

DerFussi@vi.wikivoyage

The wiki is almost abandoned and i would check it regularely and take care of it as long as needed. I am currently bureaucrat on Wikivoyage/de,it,en and admin on sv. -- DerFussi 04:59, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

As your user page and voy:vi:Thảo luận Wikivoyage:Bảo quản viên are in english, how much vi do your speak actually? --Krd 09:01, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

{{on hold}} till 7 july--Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 07:42, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

I don't speak Vietnamese. But the wiki is de-facto abandoned currently. I wanna help with removing spam/vandalissm blocking spammers and help with features by editing MW napespace if necessary. -- DerFussi 10:20, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Meanwhile i got support of two Vietnamese members. -- DerFussi 08:26, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

I can help in the contents.--Cheers! (talk) 08:42, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

I had some feeling that if there is only one admin at all (as you say, abandoned wiki), they should be somewhat capable of the local language. I don't know, though, if this is or should be a requirement, so please disregard my comment if it is unreasonable. --Krd 14:36, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Main task currently is handling vandalism and spam. Currently stewards and global sysops do it from time to time (not speaking Vietnamese as well). I drop by daily and mark spams as spam and wait for a global sysop to have it deleted. This is double work. Cheers! is going to help with Vietnamese and we can built up some features together if necessary. -- DerFussi 07:36, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

•  Granted for 6 months to expire on 2016-01-07. Discussion open sufficient length of time with no significant opposition. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. -- Avi (talk) 14:09, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks -- DerFussi 05:19, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

 Removed - Taketa (talk) 16:07, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Removed —MarcoAurelio 15:16, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Sushilmishra@gom.wikipedia

My temporary adminship has expired and i was expecting some 1 to come forward before my term finishes but none came forward...so i request you to please extend my adminship for some time till some other user comes forward...tnx... Sushilmishra (talk) 11:30, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

On hold until 16 October. --MF-W 17:09, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

 Granted for 3 months to expire on 2016-01-16. -- Jusjih (talk) 00:08, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

removed --Stryn (talk) 17:28, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Postituvi@etwikiquote

I'd like to improve Estonian Wikiquote, delete some pages and edit sidebar. There are no active users currently (except me). I have already improved Estonian Wikibooks project. Postituvi (talk) 03:59, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

 Granted for 3 months to expire on 2016-01-16. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Ruslik (talk) 20:41, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Thanks! Postituvi (talk) 08:41, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

removed --Stryn (talk) 17:28, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

MKar@or.wikisource

I have permanent Admin status @or.wikipedia since 17 May, 2011, so I request for permanent Admin status/ Admin status till any other Odia Wikimedian comes forward to handle the charge @or.wikisource. Thanks. Mrutyunjaya Kar (talk) 11:31, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

 Granted for 4 months to expire on 2016-01-19. --MF-W 13:45, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Note: user is requesting an extension at SRP. —MarcoAurelio 21:36, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

extended--Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 16:22, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

theenjay36@cebwikipedia

The admins at Cebuano Wikipedia are inactive, so I'm nominating myself. I will be there to perform some cleanup and to combat vandalism. theenjay36 11:47, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Please contact the local bureaucrat to handle your request (and keep in mind that you only posted it on Oct 3, so he will probably want to wait at least a week or so before he acts on it). Note also that one local admin is in fact active, though that does of course not prevent you from becoming one too. --MF-W 03:45, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

MF-Warburg, it has been two months since the bureaucrat's last activity. theenjay36 04:45, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

That doesn't need to mean anything, cf. the request of KSFT@jbo.wikipedia above. --MF-W 17:34, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Anyway, I've left a message on his talk page though I know that he's inactive. For how long should I wait and what should I do if I didn't get a response? theenjay36 11:23, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

I think after a week or so, stewards can handle your request. --MF-W 17:03, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

 Granted for 3 months to expire on 2016-01-23. once this temporary access has expired, please start another local request and we can extend the access for longer. MBisanz ^talk 17:57, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

removed --Stryn (talk) 17:23, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Pxos@fiwikiquote

• Special:Userrights/Pxos@fiwikiquote

See [7]. --MF-W 12:43, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

extended - Made permanent, as per local bureaucrat request. - Taketa (talk) 18:05, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

-revi@kowikiversity

3rd time RfA. (1st, 2nd) No oppose for a week. Thank you. — regards, Revi 10:11, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

 Granted for 6 months to expire on 2016-01-31. --MF-W 18:04, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Extended - Taketa (talk) 13:10, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

-revi@kowikiversity

3rd time RfA. (1st, 2nd) No oppose for a week. Thank you. — regards, Revi 10:11, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

 Granted for 6 months to expire on 2016-01-31. --MF-W 18:04, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Extended - Taketa (talk) 13:10, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Cekli829@gag.wikipedia

I am a sysop in az.wikipedia since 2010. We have just few users on gag.wikipedia. I'm there now most active User. Long time no admin. So I need admin flag till we elect new admin. I need it for technical issues and to delete this Candidates for speedy deletion pages... Please give me admin rights. Thanks. ►Cekli829 10:27, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Is there somewhere a local announcement made? --Stryn (talk) 18:26, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

No. I have no announcement to make. Now there are no active user does not exist. I'm there now most active User. If active users in the future, voting can be done. --►Cekli829 19:05, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

@Stryn, I did announcement: [8] --►Cekli829 11:24, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

 On hold until 21 September. --Stryn (talk) 14:18, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

 Granted for 4 months to expire on 2016-01-21. MBisanz ^talk 22:41, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks! --►Cekli829 10:41, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Removed - Taketa (talk) 06:48, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

ismail4all@so.wikipedia.org

 On hold till 17 October 2015. Ruslik (talk) 17:34, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Ruslik its already 20 October, and still waiting for response. Ismail4all (talk) 20:31, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

After initiating the "Project resysoping sowiki" here, please allow me to type some lines in order to support this request. I know it is hard to care for wikis whose languages no steward or global sysop can read, but I was thinking that there had to be some kind of standard procedure for trivial administration coverage. Now I know that this is not the case and that a solution, at least a temporary one, needs to be created.

This is why I wanted you to remember the enthusiastic phrases about activating Africa and the fundamentality of community health: sowiki as a project has a problem its community cannot solve by itself. Ismail4all is willing to shoulder responsibilty and to tidy up where tidying up is overdue. As far as I can tell he should be able to proof he is the right choice. Please give sowiki a chance to put the record straight by themselves. Thanks, → «« Man77 »» ^[de] 19:14, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

 Granted for 3 months to expire on 2016-01-29. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Savh^ñ 13:35, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Note: user is requesting an extension at SRP. —MarcoAurelio 21:37, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Extended - Taketa (talk) 07:04, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

सत्यम् मिश्र@bh.wikipedia

Hello! I believe my temporary adminship on bhojpuri wikipedia will be over in one-two days. I request it be extended for at least six months. Thank you very much! --सत्यम् मिश्र (talk) 11:26, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

• In progress… until March 31. -- Avi (talk) 16:53, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

 Granted for 1 year to expire on 2016-03-31. Ajraddatz (talk) 02:42, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks Ajraddatz! I request you to kindly announce the same result on local discussion page in परिणाम (result) sub section, if possible. It will be a good thing. Thanks again!!!--सत्यम् मिश्र (talk) 10:18, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Extended to the permanent. Ruslik (talk) 17:12, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Jmhudak@meta

Jmhudak is a developer working with me on an OAuth-based application. Please grant him Confirmed status so that he can register an OAuth consumer for development purposes.Ragesoss (talk) 19:05, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Done Matanya (talk) 19:07, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

अभय नातू@mr.wikipedia

I am kicking off an outreach IEG project on January 4th. I anticipate having to create multiple accounts on w:mr sporadically between Jan 4th and July 4th, 2016. Please grant AccountCreator right to w:mr:User:अभय नातू on w:mr. I am an admin and 'crat on w:mr but I do not have access to grant this flag locally. I do not need this access permanently. It can be taken away shortly after July 4th, 2016.

My project will potentially operate on many other Indic languages including gu, hi, ka, te, ta, etc. Do I need to request temporary AccountCreator flag on each of them separately?

Thank you.

अभय नातू (talk) 22:12, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi अभय नातू, accountcreator flag would only give the "noratelimit" right. This is already part of the bureaucrat flag. So you already have all the rights, and adding this would not change anything. Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 16:01, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

This flag is also part of the sysop flag. Ruslik (talk) 16:04, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for the explanation. I wasn't aware of the above. What about wikis on which I am not a 'crat and sysop, e.g. w:gu, w:hi, etc? Is my id subject to ratelimit or does this flag go across projects?

Have a great 2016!

अभय नातू (talk) 18:25, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

No, it does not go across all projects. Ruslik (talk) 07:26, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Ok. I'll request temporary access to each of the other project if/when required.

Thanks.

अभय नातू (talk) 17:56, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Andrei Stroe@ro.wikibooks

In the link above is a request from a ro.wikipedia admin to have transwiki rights on ro.wikibooks. The request is reasonable, since at ro.wiki we sometimes face with pages that would rather fit to wikibooks. Please note that there aren't any votes against, with the last comment dating since 11.12.2015. --Winter^eu 08:10, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi Winter, he already has the userright since 30 December. Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 08:46, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Voloh28@rowiki

Autopatrol rights.Andrei Stroe (talk) 13:48, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

According to ro:Special:Listă_drepturi_grup#sysop, autopatrol rights can be given by administrators. Do you mean patroller rights instead? —MarcoAurelio 17:56, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Yes, indeed, my mistake. I meant patroller. Andrei Stroe (talk) 12:42, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Done: 13 ianuarie 2016 15:08 MarcoAurelio (discuție | contribuții | blocare) a schimbat apartenența la grup pentru Voloh28 de la patrulă automată la patrulă automată și patrulă (Wikipedia:Candidați/Patrulare/Voloh28 & https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=15238633#Voloh28.40rowiki). Is rowiki going to be without bureaucrats for a long time? If so, maybe you can consider enabling administrators handling this kind of "petty" permissions. Best regards. —MarcoAurelio 15:11, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Jimmy Xu@zhwikiquote

Requesting for importer right. This is very similar to what I have asked for on a few sister projects. The discussion has been there for some three months without any comment, and is now on the top of the page waiting to be archived. Jimmy Xu (talk) 22:50, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

How long will you need it for? MBisanz ^talk 02:27, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

As this is intended for handling AfDs on zhwiki, I would say I don't have a set expiry time in mind. Jimmy Xu (talk) 12:44, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Done that's reasonable. MBisanz ^talk 14:14, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Jimmy Xu@zh.wikibooks

Please grant import flag for a month with 2 supporting votes without opposition.Jusjih (talk) 01:05, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

 Granted for 1 month to expire on 2016-02-24. Ajraddatz (talk) 09:13, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

KartikMistry@gu.wikipedia

On the rollbacker user right has been activate in guwiki so please grant this right as per discussion. thanks.--Bhatakati aatma (talk) 12:44, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

On the link provided I do not see a response by KartikMistry. Please give a link where KartikMistry accepts the vote, or where he asks for the right. Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 13:31, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

i have left a message to KartikMistry. Please wait one day. Thanks.--Bhatakati aatma (talk) 16:34, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

OK. Accepted. Thanks @User:Bhatakati aatma --KartikMistry (talk) 09:05, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Done It would be very advisable to request a configuration change to make the rollback right assignable by local sysops. Currently no local group is able to do it; I guess that was not intended. --MF-W 15:49, 29 January 2016 (UTC)