Steward requests/Permissions/2019-07

Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive first created in July 2019, although the comments contained were likely posted before and after this date. See current discussion.

Ooswesthoesbes@li.wikinews

Ooswesthoesbes has been re-elected as a administrator (on Limburgish Wikinews). Can you please grant him admin rights again for a new period? Generally a term of one year is granted. When one views his service as an administrator on many more projects, I think it is very fair to make an exception for him to grant him these rights for an indefinite term. There is no risk at all for Ooswesthoesbes (5 votes in favour with a total of 5 votes - and again re-elected). He is an acclaimed user and administrator yet for a long time and on many projects. Sincerely, Ymnes (talk) 16:53, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

 On hold until 1 July 2019 Ruslik (talk) 18:55, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 21:00, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Thank you both very much :) --OosWesThoesBes (talk) 08:59, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Thanks indeed! Ymnes (talk) 17:53, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Kaleem Bhatti@sd.wiktionary

(your remarks) Kaleem Bhatti (talk) 14:08, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

What permission do you want? Ruslik (talk) 20:28, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

@Ruslik0: I want administration at sd.Wiktionary because at sd.wiktionary is only 1 administration Kaleem Bhatti (talk) 03:31, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

Then you need to start a local discussion first. Ruslik (talk) 08:48, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

@Ruslik0: I have added local discussion link Kaleem Bhatti (talk) 15:04, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Please, transclude that subpage to the main discussion page. Ruslik (talk) 20:04, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

@Ruslik0: done Kaleem Bhatti (talk) 06:32, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

I do not see any transclusion. Ruslik (talk) 20:50, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Now check transclusion. Kaleem Bhatti (talk) 03:24, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

???? Ruslik (talk) 12:36, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

@Kaleem Bhatti: It's still not transcluded on a request for administrator rights page. Please do so. Trijnstel_talk 21:14, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

@Trijnstel: Please now check I have added administrators link and sorry because first I was not understand Kaleem Bhatti (talk) 05:33, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

@Ruslik0: Kaleem Bhatti (talk) 13:03, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Either you transclude it properly or I will close this request as not done. Ruslik (talk) 20:52, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

@Ruslik0: Could you please help me how can I transclude it. Kaleem Bhatti (talk) 16:35, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

@Ruslik0: Kaleem Bhatti (talk)

• @Kaleem Bhatti: sorry for the slow response here. I've transcluded your request here -- please translate the header. It looks like most of the community has already commented, but I will leave the request open for another couple of days just in case. Apologies again for the delay. – Ajraddatz (talk) 14:55, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

@Ajraddatz: I have translated header Kaleem Bhatti (talk) 06:09, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

@Base: Kaleem Bhatti (talk) 01:56, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

 Granted for 3 months to expire on 2019-10-06. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. -- Stryn (talk) 12:31, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Munkhzaya.E@mn.wikipedia

Hello, my administrator rights expire soon, which is why I would like to continue to renew or long-lasting rights. Yours sincerely Munkhzaya.E (talk) 07:20, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Munkhzaya.E, could you please start a new discussion and have it last for at least a week? --Base (talk) 16:56, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Hello Base, that was the new discussion, I just did not delete the earlier answers, now everything fits. Best regards Munkhzaya.E (talk) 05:45, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

 Granted for 1 year to expire on 2020-07-06. -- Stryn (talk) 12:33, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Asdfugil@yue.wikitionary

Asdfugil (talk) 02:53, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

 Granted for 1 year to expire on 2020-07-10. Ruslik (talk) 20:07, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Coconutic@pih.wikipedia

 On hold until 10 July 2019 Ruslik (talk) 20:55, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

 Granted for 6 months to expire on 2020-01-10. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Ruslik (talk) 20:02, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Thank you. Coconutic (talk) 21:40, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Gcd822@kowikiversity

Open for about a month. — regards, Revi 19:02, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Seeing that it has just one support and that it looks it'll be the first time Gcd822 gets admin rights on ko.wv; would 3 months be a an appropriate first term? —MarcoAurelio (talk) 19:38, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

LGTM for standard temporary adminships. — regards, Revi 11:37, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

 Granted for 3 months to expire on 2019-10-13. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 11:43, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Huñvreüs@brwikiquote

Hello. I am requesting sysop rights on the Breton Wikiquote for three months, since this looks customary for a small wiki and a first-time adminship. Huñvreüs (talk) 09:10, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

I realised that the first person to comment did not use a template or anything understandable by a non-Breton speaker. If you understand French, you can use this automatic translator to check that his intention was indeed to support. Huñvreüs (talk) 17:18, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

 Granted for 3 months to expire on 2019-10-16. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Ruslik (talk) 20:32, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Thanks. Huñvreüs (talk) 05:06, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

Babooneh@fa.wiktionary

per local discussion please grant 1 year temporary adminship for the above-mentioned user,discussion was on village pump for more than two weeks Mardetanha ^talk 09:58, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

 Granted for 1 year to expire on 2020-07-18. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. --Alaa :)..! 12:25, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

Vuzorg@diq.wikipedia

I'm a native speaker of Zazaki and active user of Zazaki Wikipedia. I know nearly all dialects and accents of Zazaki. I want to help our administrators. Vuzorg (talk) 21:19, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

 On hold until 18 July --Alaa :)..! 10:43, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

 Granted for 6 months to expire on 2020-01-18. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. --Alaa :)..! 12:28, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

Hi, I requested it for permanently in Zazaki Wikipedia and the community accepted it as permanently. May you correct it please?. Best regards... Vuzorg (talk) 15:13, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

DARIO SEVERI@pt.wikivoyage

This is the third time that I request Administrator access in this project, the last one I got 18 months. Is it possible get longer or permanent adminship? I am a permanent global sysop with over 109,000 editions [1] distributed in four hundred projects of the Wikimedia Foundation. I am also a sysop on Wikinews (pt) and Wikipedia (pt). In addition to the normal editions as editor I have more than 25,000 administrative editions as sysop in two hundreds of projects.

I also announced my application here [2]. Thank you. DARIO SEVERI (talk) 06:49, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

 Granted for 3 years to expire on 2022-07-19. — regards, Revi 13:12, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Luensu1959@lij.wikipedia.org

I am requesting adminship for the third time and hope to receive a term longer than one year. As a user I have been supporting Wikipedia Ligure since 2014. I am active also on translatewiki and wikisource (wikivivagna) with regard to the Genoese (Ligurian) language. Thanks in advance --Luensu1959 (talk) 13:05, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 17:43, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Snsqr@km.wikipedia

Hi, I'd like to request sysop or possibly bureaucrat rights on Khmer Wikipedia. This wiki administrative group seems inactive quite a long time and the Khmer wiki too has been under no control (https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Meta:Requests_for_help_from_a_sysop_or_bureaucrat/Archives/2018-01#Administration_of_Khmer-wiki_pages). Though, I may have limited capacity and time, I hope I can help when I'm free to keep the Khmer wiki alive. Thanks, Snsqr (talk) 06:16, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

You should request the rights locally by starting a discussion on the appropriate local forum. Ruslik (talk) 20:34, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

@Snsqr:? --Alaa :)..! 12:30, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

Because no active bureaucrat to grant.Snsqr (talk) 00:12, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

You still need to announce your intention to be a sysop on your wiki to allow people to voice their opinion. — regards, Revi 13:13, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

No worries. Please cancel this request. The community is inactive, all RfA have been on hold since 2011. https://km.wikipedia.org/wiki/វិគីភីឌា:សុំធ្វើជា​អ្នក​គ្រប់គ្រង Snsqr (talk) 23:02, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Withdrawn by requester. Snsqr should you need it, just start a conversation on village pump, and after 7 days report here. Even if there isn't anyone voicing any opinion, access can still be granted, although it will be most likely a temporary one. Regards,--Cohaf (talk) 15:14, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Vuzorg@diq.wikipedia

Hi, I requested administrator access for permanently in Zazaki Wikipedia. The community voted it for voting a permanent admin, achieved consensus, unanimity, to make me admin of Zazaki Wikipedia permanently. Bu it was given me only for 6 months. This is really insufficient and very short duration for Zazaki Wikipedia because of that there is a small community in Zazaki Wikipedia and we can't vote adminship continually. I requested it for permanently because there is no permanently-active admin in Zazaki Wikipedia for years. May you correct it please? Best regards. Vuzorg (talk) 10:14, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Not done You have been already granted adminship for 6 months. 20:51, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

But it's really a very short duration, only 6 months. And I wanted it permanently from the community of Zazaki Wikipedia and the community approved my request. What's the reason of 6 months? I didn't see any reason for it. Vuzorg (talk) 11:27, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

夢蝶葬花@gan.wikipedia

Thank you. 夢蝶葬花 (talk) 00:00, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

 Granted for 6 months to expire on 2020-01-24. Ruslik (talk) 12:02, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Nirajan pant@dty.wikipedia

I've been contributing in dtywiki since it was in incubator. Currently I am contributing as an Admin but my admin rights are to expire on July 25 and there is no other admins in this wiki. I have put an application to the community for the permanent admin rights and the community has shown there support the the application. I request for the approval of permanent admin rights request. Nirajan pant (talk) 16:18, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

 On hold until 25 July 2019 Ruslik (talk) 20:53, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

 Granted for 2 years to expire on 2021-07-25. — regards, Revi 20:03, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Techyan@zh.wikinews

Need admin flag to deal with backlogs. --Techyan（Talk） 14:16, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

 Granted for 3 months to expire on 2019-10-28. Ruslik (talk) 20:44, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Janak Bhatta@dty.wikipedia

Hello, I am active on Doteli Wikipedia. I've been contributing in dtywiki since it was in incubator. I would like to request permanent admin rights for some admin works on the Wikipedia. Please find the community vote here for support on my permanent admin rights. I would like to request for the approval of permanent admin rights.--Janak Bhatta (talk) 06:42, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 20:43, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

الناجم العاجم@ar.wiktionary

I'm an administrator (with interface administrator access) in Arabic Wiktionary since January of 2018. Now, I ask permanent administrator and permanent interface administrator accesses. Thank you. الناجم العاجم (talk) 23:32, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

 On hold until 28 July 2019 Ruslik (talk) 07:59, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

I do not seen any evidence that you ever had administrator or interface administrator access in Arabic Wiktionary. Ruslik (talk) 20:37, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

@Ruslik0: I have changed my username, it was being (عبد الإله صديقي) and changed recently by @علاء: --الناجم العاجم (talk) 10:06, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Yes here (previous username log) --Alaa :)..! 11:28, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 20:53, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Itsmine@zh-classical.wikipedia

pre community discussion WAN233 (talk) 15:04, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

@Itsmine: Please, enable 2FA. Ruslik (talk) 20:08, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

@Ruslik0: I have enabled this at last year, and now becomes "TOTP (one-time token)", is this correct? Thanks!Itsmine (talk) 03:20, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

BTW, I accept the nomination, thank you very much!--Itsmine (talk) 11:13, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 20:41, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Thanks very much!--Itsmine (talk) 10:22, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

GeoO@hywikisource

Please grant User:GeoO temprorary interface adminship on hy.wikisource per community notice to create and adjust MediaWiki:PageNumbers.js and related scripts for the Armenian Wikisource. -- Emptyfear (talk) 06:24, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

 Granted for 3 months to expire on 2019-10-08. Ruslik (talk) 20:44, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Davidzdh@zh-classical wikipedia

per community discussion WAN233 (talk) 13:34, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

 On hold The user must enable 2FA first. Ruslik (talk) 20:09, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

I have enabled TOTP, is this correct? Thanks!- I am Davidzdh. 08:29, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

I do not understand you. TOTP is a program that can be installed. It can not be enabled or disabled. Ruslik (talk) 20:41, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

I made a mistake. I have enabled two-factor authentication. - I am Davidzdh. 19:30, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 20:57, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Tiven2240@mrwikisource

I am the only administrator on that project and needed the temporary technical admin userrights to update/repair/install gadgets on this wikisource project. Please extend the same untill my temporary administrator userrights expire on 2019-09-24 20:04. more info Thanking you in advance. --Tiven2240 (talk) 11:49, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

I do not see any discussion regarding your interface admin rights. Ruslik (talk) 20:52, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

@Ruslik0: There are just a few number of people active on that project. And so it was notified on AN that the gadget Hotcat is not working by @सुबोध कुलकर्णी: at subsection of AN साहित्याचे वर्गीकरण. Since I am the only active administrator there I have been working for maintaining that project. Almost every gadget is being installed by me in my first tenure of technical administrator. Hope this helps --Tiven2240 (talk) 01:26, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

@Ruslik0:

• No advance rights should be given to them, as their earlier requests never had community support. Their sysop rights were removed on mrwikipedia by community. Whatever gadegets they ever brought to mrwikisource were only because other active editors like user:Jayantanath, user:सुबोध कुलकर्णी, requested them to do so, and even in that, they had to be reminded several times.
• So I don't think there is any point in even continuing their sysop rights and definitely no use of new rights. As any advance rights would result in arrogant misuse like they did on mrwikipedia.
• Their answers to my questions on evaluation of admins page on mrwikisource tells it clearly.
• Additionally calling community inactive is blatant insult of active editors.(As they only mentioned that, there are requests from community to work on hotcat!) There was no indication to community that, tiven is requesting technical admin rights here. Another proof of the fact that they are keeping community in dark. QueerEcofeminist ^{"cite! even if you fight"!!!} [they/them/their] 06:15, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Thank you QueerEcofeminist for your brief explanation and it was expected and it would be great if you would do a more research and have yourself clear about the problems at the Stewards noticeboard. Just for my explanation on the above mentioned things. I didn't find any instance of me getting de-admined by @अभय नातू: you can check the same on my history at mrwp. Soon after jayanthanth asked me to install gadgets it was done by me on the same day and a few were done in period of 10 days as I was busy in my personal life and they were not on priority. The history of my talk page says it all [3]. By citing another project and evaluating on another doesn't actually makes any sense. As my contribution speaks it all. I would like you to again go through my above request and find out where I have mentioned the community as Inactive. Hope this helps. Thank you. --Tiven2240 (talk) 07:59, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

You should still start a local discussion about your interface admin rights. Ruslik (talk) 20:36, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

@Ruslik0: you have been always doing a good job. But I don't feel I can continue in a unacceptable volunteer environment. Sorry but I withdraw my nomination. Thank you. --Tiven2240 (talk) 10:00, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

Request withdrawn --Alaa :)..! 12:28, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

NMW03@azwiktionary

I need this right for fix templates and gadgets. Can it be permanently? (I am sysop and interface-admin of azWP.) Thanks. NMW03 (talk) 00:45, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

 On hold until 23 July 2019 Ruslik (talk) 20:24, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

 Granted for 6 months to expire on 2020-01-24. Ruslik (talk)

ԱշոտՏՆՂ@hy.wiktionary

--ԱշոտՏՆՂ (talk) 00:06, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

 Granted for 6 months to expire on 2020-01-24. Ruslik (talk) 17:50, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Huñvreüs@brwikiquote

The current state of the Breton Wikiquote CSS is a mess, so I would like to be able to fix it. I suggest to adjust the duration so that the interface administrator rights are valid until the same date as my sysop rights (October 16). I have already enabled two-factor authentication. Huñvreüs (talk) 15:52, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Bundled with the adminship. — regards, Revi 10:41, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Thanks. Huñvreüs (talk) 11:49, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

丁子君@zh-classical.wikipedia

pre commiuty discussion 47.240.28.179 14:34, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

@丁子君: Please, enable 2FA. Ruslik (talk) 20:50, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

@Ruslik0: I had already enabled 2FA. Thank you. --丁子君 (talk) 23:55, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

 Granted for 10 months to expire on 2020-05-03. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Ruslik (talk) 20:58, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Beeblebrox@en.wikipedia

I've emailed our arbcom about restoring my voluntarily removed oversight permission. I would expect one of them will comment here to confirm. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:01, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

For the English Wikipedia, we expect a member of the Committee or clerk for them submit a request. — regards, Revi 21:18, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

 On hold, pending ArbCom confirmation. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 23:00, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

Thank you. Now confirmed. We request the Oversight permission be restored to Beeblebrox. For the Arbitration Committee, AGK ■ 10:16, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Thinking out loud: AGK is a member of the AC, elected in ACE2018, SUL connected. Good to go. — regards, Revi 10:37, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Wizardman@en.wp

I am requesting removal of the bureaucrat flag from enwiki. Wizardman (talk) 20:15, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

 On hold for 1 day, standard for resignation of advanced permissions --Alaa :)..! 20:16, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

@Wizardman: Thank you for your service. I hope you take this day to consider if it makes sense to keep that bit so you can pitch in on occasion.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 04:16, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Done --Alaa :)..! 21:15, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Grönneger_1@nds-nl.wikipedia

He hasn't been active the past couple of years. User has already been notified in april that his admin status is going to be removed because of inactivity. Servien (talk) 12:55, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

@Servien: Does nds-nl Wikipedia have any specific policy about administrator inactivity? Ruslik (talk) 20:46, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

No, we currently don't have a specific policy. If we notice that admins haven't been very active the past (couple of) year(s) we ask if the user wants to retain his/her admin status. If so, the admin at least has to contribute to the project in some way, if this is not the case then admin rights don't have any added value and should be removed. Servien (talk) 21:35, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

I am not sure that I can remove the admin bit without a local policy or a vote. Ruslik (talk) 20:56, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

Maybe just let AAR kicks in? — regards, Revi 10:14, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

AAR message sent on June 19. Permissions can be removed on July 19 if the user do not reply or, if replying, the community does not support continued access. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 10:16, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Not done, provisionally. This user is currently under AAR review. If there's no reply from Grönneger_1 by July 19, their permissions will be removed. Best regards, —MarcoAurelio (talk) 22:10, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Steinbach@nds-nl.wikipedia

He hasn't been active the past couple of years. User has already been notified in april that his admin status is going to be removed because of inactivity. Servien (talk) 13:05, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

Not sure if this should be AAR handled? — regards, Revi 10:02, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Oh, noted by Ruslik above. — regards, Revi 10:13, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

A note that this user was not notified in the 2018 AAR round. --Rschen7754 18:44, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Not done Absent a local inactivity policy or community consensus this cannot be handled as is. I note Steinbach returned to activity after your message so I cannot even validly start AAR proceedings against Steinbach. If nds-nl.wikipedia is still interested on removing Steinbach from the administrator a local vote should be held. Best regards, —MarcoAurelio (talk) 22:08, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

FakirNL@nlwiki

User doesn't meet the activity criterion. Please remove sysop flag. --bdijkstra (talk) 08:45, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 20:44, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Elmoro@arwiki

Remove sysop flag, please. Thanks on advance --Alaa :)..! 18:00, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 20:48, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Addshore@wikidatawiki

Addshore has not made the required 5 sysop/property creator actions in the last 6 months. Please remove sysop. Rschen7754 03:39, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Done, please thank them for their service. --Base (talk) 23:13, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Csigabi@wikidatawiki

Csigabi has not made the required 5 sysop/property creator actions in the last 6 months. Please remove sysop. Rschen7754 03:39, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

 Done, please thank them for their service. --Base (talk) 23:13, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Dan Koehl@wikidatawiki

Dan Koehl has not made the required 5 sysop/property creator actions in the last 6 months. Please remove sysop. Rschen7754 03:39, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Done, please thank them for their service. --Base (talk) 23:13, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

User rights on wikimania2018.wikimedia

https://wikimania2018.wikimedia.org has been closed, we should be removing permissions as per Closing_projects_policy#Definition_of_actions unless there's any objection. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 09:27, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

List of users

• Abuse filter (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
• AlvaroMolina (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
• Base (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
• Brackenheim (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
• Discott (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
• Emnamizouni (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
• Flixtey (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
• Harej (WMF) (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
• L235 (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
• Louisewikimania (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
• Pbsouthwood (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
• Rzuwig (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
• Samuele2002 (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
• Wittylama (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)

—MarcoAurelio (talk) 21:27, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

Done —MarcoAurelio (talk) 21:33, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

Chmee2@cs.wikipedia

Hello, as a cs.wikipedia bureaucrat, I request removal of admin bit from Chmee2 per local inactivity policy. Martin Urbanec (talk) 20:05, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

Admin bit has been removed. einsbor _talk 12:23, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

MIKHEIL@ka.wikipedia

According to local policy If an administrator within 3 months doesn't make 500 edits and 50 sysop actions, sysop rights will be removed without voting. In last three-month periods he has not made the required 500 edits; see 25 February—25 May (483 total). In Georgian Wikipedia, Bureaucrats can't remove sysop rights, and therefore I apply to stewards on Meta-Wiki. Best regards, გიო ოქრო (talk) 19:54, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

@გიო ოქრო: Should the bureaucrat right be removed as well? Ruslik (talk) 08:57, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

@Ruslik0: No, because that rule don't includes bureaucrat right. გიო ოქრო (talk) 09:10, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

@გიო ოქრო: Bureaucrats override admins for they can grant people admins. Chances are that once a steward removes the admin access of MIKHEIL, it could be soon granted by MIKHEIL themselves. --Super Wang hates PC _{You hate, too?} 09:29, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

@Super Wang: Yes, there are. But I think MIKHEIL will not do it. I just apply you about the administrator right. Do it as you decide. გიო ოქრო (talk) 12:22, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Discussion that should (more likely) have happened locally
Administrator rights from Mikheil can be taken away only after filing an request in the Georgian Wikipedia and after discussion there can be administrative actions. So, while at the local level the issue is not resolved there is nothing to discuss. I'm waiting for request at the local level, and without the decision of the local community, the administrative actions of the steward are not welcomed. --Mehman 97 13:34, 26 May 2019 (UTC) „If an administrator within 3 months doesn't make 500 edits and 50 sysop actions, sysop rights will be removed without voting (automatically)“ — There is no need for discussion. Georgian Bureaucrats can't remove sysop rights. გიო ოქრო (talk) 13:49, 26 May 2019 (UTC) ვიკიპედია:ადმინისტრატორები/ადმინისტრატორის_სტატუსის_მოხსნა — It is not written that I don't have the right to request on Meta and I have to request in the local wiki first. გიო ოქრო (talk) 13:56, 26 May 2019 (UTC) In 2014 MIKHEIL himself applied to Meta-Wiki and demanded to resign 4 administrators (Zangala, BRUTE, Giorgi13, Island). He did not make any request in Georgian Wikipedia and directly wrote a resignation request. He indicated only the discussion of introduction of the rule. There was no local discussion. Now, when there is rule, there is no need for local discussion. Best regards გიო ოქრო (talk) 15:04, 26 May 2019 (UTC) 2014 case there was a discussion and elections where they took the appropriate decision (please do not mislead people). When the question is about 17 editing and because of this, asking for removing status, perhaps a discussion is required here. Without a local discussion, the status cannot be removing and everyone should respect the decision of the local community, no one has the right to bypass the opinion of the community. This is not a place for discussion, so submit request at the local level and continue the discussion there. Kindly, --Mehman 97 15:14, 26 May 2019 (UTC) Repeat the same: „If an administrator within 3 months does not make 500 edits and 50 sysop actions, sysop rights will be removed without voting (automatic)- There is no need for discussion and community can not stop resignation if sysop has not made the required 500 edits. Show me rule that says, that I can't apply to Meta-Wiki. გიო ოქრო (talk) 15:19, 26 May 2019 (UTC) For context stewards might want to review Requests for comment/Vote of confidence on sysops and unblock for user Deu on kawiki. And good luck to whomever makes a call on this. --Rschen7754 15:48, 26 May 2019 (UTC) In the discussion reported by Mehman, the new rule is discussed and does not include resignation of concrete administrators. In Georgian Wikipedia there is page (ვიკიპედია:ადმინისტრატორები/სტატუსის მოხსნა), where you can demand the resignation of sysop, but the community can't stop that process, if sysop has not made the required edits. So, the application in Georgian Wiki makes no sense, because the community does not solve the result (the result of discussion of community is that RULE) and the bureaucrats can not remove the status. For these reasons I apply here and not in Georgian Wiki. There is no rule that prohibits this. Please act according to the rules and remove sysop rights from MIKHEIL. Best regards, გიო ოქრო (talk) 20:02, 26 May 2019 (UTC) It's super that Rschen7754 noted Requests for comment/Vote of confidence on sysops and unblock for user Deu on kawiki. Keep in mind that this request is made by a person who has a personal dislike for MIKHEIL. I’m not going to continue the discussion here, which should be conducted at the local level, but at the end I’ll add that there are not enough 17 editing and this number is not a reason for removing the status, so this issue should be decided by the consensus at the local level (administrator who has more than 400 editing is clearly not a passive admin). Kindly, --Mehman 97 22:37, 26 May 2019 (UTC) I don't have personal dislike for MIKHEIL and for other users. The rule is the rule (MIKHEIL supported himself during the voting). The rule don't includes "more than 400 edits". He (MIKHEIL) did not made required edits, and therefor sysop rights must be remove. There is a consensus at the local level — indentured rule supported by the majority of active users. According that rule discussions and consensus are not required and the rights should be automatically removed. Regards, გიო ოქრო (talk) 06:29, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

According to the local rules, sysop status from MIKHEIL must be removed without discussion and vote, only by the stewards of Meta-Wiki; discussion on local level and decision of the local community is no longer needed (This is written in the rule — „If an administrator within 3 months does not make 500 edits and 50 sysop actions, sysop rights will be removed without voting (automatically)“). He is not an active editor. He made 483 edits in three months (from which 70-80% was Usertalk) and he has not made the required edits. Local rules don't say that I don't have the right for request on meta-wiki, especially that the Georgian bureaucrats can't remove sysop rights. @Super Wang, Ruslik0, -revi, and Tegel: and other stewards, please summarize that issue and make a decision. Best regards, გიო ოქრო (talk) 20:49, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

@გიო ოქრო:It may be disappointing, but far from your prediction, I am not a steward. Sorry for being unable to assist you. --Super Wang hates PC _{You hate, too?} 23:25, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Just to show an identical case, the rules of pt.wiki also allow a user to be a bureaucrat, but not an sysop (and there we also have bureaucrats who are not sysops). A few years ago I asked for the removal of only my sysop rights and the request was done without further delay. Érico (talk) 21:49, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

But it was your own request. Ruslik (talk) 13:08, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Yes... I am not discussing the merit of this request, but only stating that it is natural to have wikis in which a user can be a bureaucrat but not sysop. Érico (talk) 16:04, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

My point was that it is pointless to remove sysop access from a local bureaucrat who can make himself a sysop again the next day. Ruslik (talk) 13:55, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Yes, he can, but without election he has no right to make himself a sysop, and therefor I think Mikheil will not do it. At last, sysop right must be remove (according to the local policy). Thanks, გიო ოქრო (talk) 18:07, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Can Mikheil confirm this here? Ruslik (talk) 17:55, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Let's ask him:

@MIKHEIL: გთხოვ დაგვიდასტურო, რომ იმ შემთხვევაში თუ ჩამოგერთმევა ადმინისტრატორის სტატუსი, შენ, როგორც ბიუროკრატი ამ სტატუსს არ აღიდგენ კვლავ, კენჭისყრის გარეშე.

Please confirm, that if an administrator status will be removed, you, as a bureaucrat, will not make yourself an administrator again without voting. გიო ოქრო (talk) 10:34, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

As much as I think MIKHEIL should not be an admin (per RFC I mentioned earlier) I think this is an exercise in futility. --Rschen7754 20:02, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

@Ruslik0: As we see, he isn't going to answer. გიო ოქრო (talk) 18:28, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Not done as the request seems to be pointless. Ruslik (talk) 16:32, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Стефанко1982@uk.wikipedia

I ask you to deprive me of the rights of the administrator at my own will. I want to work in Wikipedia only as a regular user.--Стефанко1982 (talk) 05:58, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

On hold for 24 hours per standard practice. @Стефанко1982: Do you want to keep the Checkuser permission? --Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 03:53, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

Also deprive me of the right Checkuser. Thanks.--Стефанко1982 (talk) 15:13, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

I was asked not to do so. I would like to cancel my request. Sorry for your concern.--Стефанко1982 (talk) 20:58, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Request withdrawn --Alaa :)..! 10:30, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Umberto NURS@it.wikinews

Inactiv from april 2018 (administrators are required to make 50 edits in the last two monts), last admin action on may 2017 (administrators are required to make 10 admin actions in the last two monts), on the list of inactive administrators from 28th August (it needs 6 months on the list to be revoked and we are now to over 10). Gce (talk) 13:23, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 20:41, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Жељко Тодоровић@sr.wikinews

Please remove only bureaucrat access. The user was granted bureaucrat access without any required prior nomination for bureaucratship. --Novak Watchmen (talk) 22:39, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

@Novak Watchmen: Why "local messages" on srwikipedia not srwikinews? can @Жељко Тодоровић and Ранко Николић: confirm by sign under my comment? --Alaa :)..! 10:42, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Confirm. --Жељко Тодоровић (talk) 13:57, 11 July 2019 (UTC) с. р.

Confirm. --Ранко Николић (talk) 20:51, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

@علاء: That's our home wiki, where we'll most likely see new messages. --Novak Watchmen (talk) 21:15, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Done --Alaa :)..! 20:10, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Thanks. --Novak Watchmen (talk) 21:22, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Ganesh Paudel@ne.wikipedia

According to local policy of Nepali Wikipedia If an administrator within 6 months doesn't make 200 edits including sysop actions, sysop rights will be removed without voting. Please see contribution of Ganesh Paudel and remove his sysop and bureaucrat rights. Thanks--Biplab Anand (Talk) 03:48, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Rights were removed. einsbor _talk 13:17, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Dimon2711@ukwikivoyage

Please revoke my sysop and IA rights--Di^Mon₂₇₁₁ 10:20, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

{{on hold}} —MarcoAurelio (talk) 10:55, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Done. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 09:53, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

콩가루@kowiki

Failed local inactivity clause (no admin actions and less than 25 edits for last 2 years, did not respond to the confirmation.) — regards, Revi 06:03, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Removed, einsbor _talk 06:58, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Veneziano@it.wikipedia

Please remove admin status. Veneziano has been already informed and thanked for his work. Thank you. --Antonio1952 (talk) 06:27, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 21:04, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

Ceppicone@it.wikipedia

Please remove admin status. Ceppicone has been already informed and thanked for his work. Thank you. --Antonio1952 (talk) 06:17, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Done – Ajraddatz (talk) 17:47, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Tiven2240@mrwikisource

Persistent harassment and flyblown volunteer environment. Unacceptable defamation caused by harassers due to it everywhere. Thanking you in advance. --Tiven2240 (talk) 09:58, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

 On hold for 1 day, standard for resignation of advanced permissions —MarcoAurelio (talk) 10:03, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

Done --Alaa :)..! 12:29, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

Florian Schneider@test2wiki

Removal of bureaucrat flag. Routine cleanup of old testers, user has been inactive on test2wiki for over a year and does not currently hold sysop+ access on any other public WMF project. User was asked on their talk page ~10 days ago if they still had a need for access without response. There is no "community" on test2wiki, the standard activity rule as documented at test.wikipedia is a one year inactivity rule (testwiki:Wikipedia:Administrators). — xaosflux ^Talk 18:14, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 20:48, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Ethno & 4D@test2wiki

Removal of bureaucrat flag. Routine cleanup of old testers, user has been inactive on test2wiki for over a year and does not currently hold sysop+ access on any other public WMF project. User was asked on their talk page ~10 days ago if they still had a need for access without response. There is no "community" on test2wiki, the standard activity rule as documented at test.wikipedia is a one year inactivity rule (testwiki:Wikipedia:Administrators). — xaosflux ^Talk 18:14, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 20:47, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Kiste11@test2wiki

Removal of bureaucrat flag. Routine cleanup of old testers, user has been inactive on test2wiki for over a year and does not currently hold sysop+ access on any other public WMF project. User was asked on their talk page ~10 days ago if they still had a need for access without response. There is no "community" on test2wiki, the standard activity rule as documented at test.wikipedia is a one year inactivity rule (testwiki:Wikipedia:Administrators). — xaosflux ^Talk 18:14, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 20:51, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Kenny McFly@test2wiki

Removal of bureaucrat flag. Routine cleanup of old testers, user has been inactive on test2wiki for over a year and does not currently hold sysop+ access on any other public WMF project. User was asked on their talk page ~10 days ago if they still had a need for access without response. There is no "community" on test2wiki, the standard activity rule as documented at test.wikipedia is a one year inactivity rule (testwiki:Wikipedia:Administrators). — xaosflux ^Talk 18:14, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 20:50, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Cmcmahon@test2wiki

Removal of bureaucrat, import, transwiki flags. Routine cleanup of old testers, user has been inactive on test2wiki for over a year and does not currently hold sysop+ access on any other public WMF project. User was asked on their talk page ~10 days ago if they still had a need for access without response. There is no "community" on test2wiki, the standard activity rule as documented at test.wikipedia is a one year inactivity rule (testwiki:Wikipedia:Administrators). — xaosflux ^Talk 18:14, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 20:42, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Mat86@plwikipedia

Due to our policy, I hereby request removal of administrator access due to lack of edits in the main namespace and administrative actions during a 1 year period. Openbk (talk) 21:36, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 20:39, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Cirdan@test2wiki

Removal of bureaucrat flag. Routine cleanup of old testers, user has been inactive on test2wiki for over a year and does not currently hold sysop+ access on any other public WMF project. User was asked on their talk page ~10 days ago if they still had a need for access without response. There is no "community" on test2wiki, the standard activity rule as documented at test.wikipedia is a one year inactivity rule (testwiki:Wikipedia:Administrators). — xaosflux ^Talk 18:14, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 20:41, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Alnilam@test2wiki

Removal of bureaucrat flag. Routine cleanup of old testers, user has been inactive on test2wiki for over a year and does not currently hold sysop+ access on any other public WMF project. User was asked on their talk page ~10 days ago if they still had a need for access without response. There is no "community" on test2wiki, the standard activity rule as documented at test.wikipedia is a one year inactivity rule (testwiki:Wikipedia:Administrators). — xaosflux ^Talk 18:14, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 20:40, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

DasMonstaaa@test2wiki

Removal of bureaucrat flag. Routine cleanup of old testers, user has been inactive on test2wiki for over a year and does not currently hold sysop+ access on any other public WMF project. User was asked on their talk page ~10 days ago if they still had a need for access without response. There is no "community" on test2wiki, the standard activity rule as documented at test.wikipedia is a one year inactivity rule (testwiki:Wikipedia:Administrators). — xaosflux ^Talk 18:14, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 20:45, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

DerMaxdorfer@test2wiki

Removal of bureaucrat flag. Routine cleanup of old testers, user has been inactive on test2wiki for over a year and does not currently hold sysop+ access on any other public WMF project. User was asked on their talk page ~10 days ago if they still had a need for access without response. There is no "community" on test2wiki, the standard activity rule as documented at test.wikipedia is a one year inactivity rule (testwiki:Wikipedia:Administrators). — xaosflux ^Talk 18:14, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 20:46, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Sietske@nl.wikipedia

Removal of administrator access. According to nl.wikipedia policies, administrators lose their admin rights when their activity has come under the limit of 250 edits in 365 days. This is the case with user Sietske since today. Apdency (talk) 19:05, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 20:59, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Martin Kraft@test2wiki

Removal of bureaucrat flag. Routine cleanup of old testers, user has been inactive on test2wiki for over a year and does not currently hold sysop+ access on any other public WMF project. User was asked on their talk page ~10 days ago if they still had a need for access without response. There is no "community" on test2wiki, the standard activity rule as documented at test.wikipedia is a one year inactivity rule (testwiki:Wikipedia:Administrators). — xaosflux ^Talk 18:14, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 20:52, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

MM@it.wikipedia

Please remove admin status. MM has been already informed and thanked for his work. Thank you. --Antonio1952 (talk) 06:33, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Done —MarcoAurelio (talk) 13:25, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

RickinBaltimore@en.wikipedia

Please remove CheckUser and Oversight permissions due to Arbitrator resignation and voluntary relinquishment. For the Arbitration Committee Katie^talk 19:45, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Done. — regards, Revi 19:55, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Xaosflux_ep@testwiki

Request for transwiki importer access for this account on testwiki, can set to expire in 3 months. There is no "community" at testwiki to discuss this with. Xaosflux ep (talk) 16:36, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Acknowledge this is an alt account of mine, I already have "import" access on testwiki but need to test some workflows without admin or import access. — xaosflux ^Talk 16:38, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Done – Ajraddatz (talk) 16:38, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

NMW03@testwiki

Please remove all my rights. Thanks. NMW03 (talk) 23:25, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Done, though in the future you could ask local bureaucrats to remove permissions on testwiki. – Ajraddatz (talk) 23:27, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

FR30799386@hifwikipedia

Would it be possible to grant me the rollback right at hif.wikipedia ? I would like to use it primarily to revert vandalism on that wiki.  — FR 06:06, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Rollback right does not exist on hifwiki, so it cannot be assigned. — regards, Revi 13:16, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

I didn't realise that hifwiki wasn't configured to have a seperate rollback user-right. Sorry for the inconveniences caused.  — FR 17:04, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

فيصل@arwikiquote

I would like to be an admin on ar.wikiquote. The discussion on ar.wikiquote is linked above. Thanks in advance.--Faisal ^talk 06:04, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

• Confirmed request. I can't proceed this request because I voted in the discussion. This discussion started since more than 7 days --Alaa :)..! 06:53, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

 Granted for 1 year to expire on 2019-07-01. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Ruslik (talk) 20:32, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Iliev@bg.wikibooks

Again applying for renewal on bgbooks (link), just like on bgsource (link), with the same reason: combating the persistent and aggressive cross-project vandalism and harassment, which our Bulgarian communities have been facing in recent years. This is a long-term and serious commitment and since the community is getting somewhat weary of the constant need to vote for the two projects, I'll really appreciate if the rights could be given for at least one year, as was the case with Wikisource above.

Cheers, — Luchesar • T/C 09:54, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

 Granted for 1 year to expire on 2019-07-02. Ruslik (talk) 20:19, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

beko@hy.wiktionary

Please prolong my sysop rights. There are 100% consensus, all positive votes. -Beko (talk) 03:22, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

 Granted for 1 year to expire on 2019-07-12. -- Trijnstel_talk 19:22, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Luensu1959@lij.wikipedia

Herewith I request a renewal for my admin rights on Wikipedia Ligure. Exactly one year ago I got a mandate and would like to keep working as admin for our small regional Wikipedia. I informed other users about my candidacy through our community portal at https://lij.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disc%C3%BBscio%C3%AEn_Wikipedia:P%C3%B2rtego_da_comunit%C3%A6 and our bulletin board at https://lij.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedi%C3%A0n

Sorry, I forgot to sign (it was July 14, 2018 at around 23.30h when I posted the original request) Luensu1959 (talk) 20:10, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

 Granted for 1 year to expire on 2019-07-16. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. -- Stryn (talk) 20:35, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Doostdar@fawikibooks

request for prolongation. Doostdar (talk) 15:29, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Please, provide link to the actual request. Ruslik (talk) 20:33, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

@Doostdar: Is there any local discussion? --Alaa :)..! 06:39, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

In the past, I have requested several times on this page in Persian Wikibooks but this time I didn't. Because it takes a long time for a discussion to come to result in a small Wiki. --Doostdar (talk) 12:42, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Just keep it open for 7 days, and then we either give/not give you rights. We can't give them without any discussion/vote. Stryn (talk) 13:47, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

No, thanks. It's the 7th time I'm requesting for the same access in a small Wiki and probably 6 month later I would ask for the same access again. It's an exhausting procedure. --Doostdar (talk) 04:24, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

That's understandable. We can look at very long access this time (either 1.5/2 years or maybe indefinite depending on the discussion result), to ease the burden on you in the future. – Ajraddatz (talk) 05:33, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

@Doostdar: so again, is there any local discussion? --Alaa :)..! 10:15, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

it's here. --Doostdar (talk) 19:51, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

 On hold until 17 July --Alaa :)..! 08:01, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Done --Alaa :)..! 08:11, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

User DARIO SEVERI@pt.wikivoyage

I have been sysop of pt.wikivoyage since 23 January 2017. I am also a Global sysop and a sysop in the Wikipedia (pt), Please, could I have a permanent admin.? Thanks DARIO SEVERI (talk) 08:58, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

 Granted for 1 year and 6 months to expire on 2019-07-21. --MF-W 09:25, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Nirajan pant@dtywikipedia

My sysop rights on dty.wikipedia has been expired. I would like to request renewal of sysop rights. Nirajan pant (talk) 12:31, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

 Granted for 1 year to expire on 2019-07-25. Ruslik (talk) 07:10, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

عبد الإله صديقي@arwiktionary

Please prolong my sysop rights. Thank you very much. --عبد الإله صديقي (talk) 22:37, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

 On hold until 22 July --Alaa :)..! 08:25, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

 Granted for 1 year to expire on 2019-07-27. — regards, Revi 08:10, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

فيصل@ar.wiktionary

Please give me sysop right. Thank you.--Faisal ^talk 09:47, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

 Granted for 1 year to expire on 2019-07-27. --MF-W 09:53, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Reptilien.19831209BE1@wawiktionary

My admin access at wawiktionary expires tomorrow and the community is agree to prolong it for 4 years. Greetings, Reptilien.19831209BE1 (talk) 18:41, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

 Granted for 1 year to expire on 2019-07-29. The community is not large enough to grant 4 years sysopship. -- --Alaa :)..! 14:54, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

@علاء:, "is now" or "is not" ? Reptilien.19831209BE1 (talk) 15:55, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

@Reptilien.19831209BE1: fixed --Alaa :)..! 16:06, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

@علاء: I don't understand considering that the user Lucyin has a sysop access without any expiration date, how do you explain it ? Reptilien.19831209BE1 (talk) 16:08, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

They were granted sysop before we decided to restrict small wikis' sysop to temporary. — regards, Revi 16:22, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Саид Мисарбиев@ce.wikipedia.org

Hey. I ask the administrator rights in the Chechen wikipedia. --Саид Мисарбиев (talk) 13:43, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

 Granted for 1 year to expire on 2019-07-30. -- --Alaa :)..! 17:53, 30 July 2018 (UTC)