Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Illinois
![]() | Points of interest related to Illinois on Wikipedia: Outline – History – Portal – Category – WikiProject – Alerts – Deletions – Stubs – Assessment – To-do |
This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Illinois. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.
- Adding a new AfD discussion
- Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:
- Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
- You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Illinois|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
- There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.
- Removing a closed AfD discussion
- Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.
- Other types of discussions
- You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Illinois. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.
- Further information
- For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.
This list is also part of the larger list of deletion debates related to US.
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/2/2a/Replacement_filing_cabinet.svg/32px-Replacement_filing_cabinet.svg.png)
watch |
Illinois
edit- Chicago and North Western 7009 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Redirect I had set up was reverted. Subject lacks independent notability from the EMD SD50 and should be redirect to that topic. No prejudice to a merge. TarnishedPathtalk 09:40, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Transportation, and Illinois. TarnishedPathtalk 09:40, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Iglesia Apostólica Filadelfia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Reviewed during NPP. No indication of notability under SNG or GNG. Small church built in 2015. Not only no GNG references, there are zero references on it. Reference is about the religion, not the church. And so is the article other than the 1 "it exists" statement. North8000 (talk) 20:48, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture, Christianity, and Illinois. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 20:58, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. No independent sources to establish notability. --Un assiolo (talk) 22:21, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: This is a bad nomination, emphasizing the current state of the article rather than the notability of the subject. However, the sorry state of the article accurately reflects the non-notable nature of the subject. A quick BEFORE indicates that the church is an independent congregation in the Pentecostal Apostolic tradition with no claim to fame, even locally. Possibility of Spanish-language sources escaping my search seems unlikely. No relevant merge or redirect target exists, so ATD isn't in play. ~ Pbritti (talk) 22:55, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- I understand that the state of the article is not the issue. The description given was indicative of wp:notability, the comments on the content of the article and sources were merely indicative of that. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 23:26, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- Helmut Michel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS��· JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't seem to have received significant coverage. All I could find on this player was a 1961 Chicago Tribune newspaper article that he was playing in goal for an amateur team participating in the National Amateur Cup, which is barely a passing mention. Another site suggests a date of birth for this player, but that's all I could find, other than a Czech namesake who ran for political office in 1989. C679 13:31, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and United States of America. C679 13:31, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. C679 13:33, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:50, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to List of United States men's international soccer players as possible search term. GiantSnowman 17:24, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect as above. I didn't find any secondary RS. Tau Corvi (talk) 19:41, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to List of United States men's international soccer players: Subject does not have the needed WP:SIGCOV to meet the WP:GNG. Redirect as a WP:ATD. Let'srun (talk) 22:12, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- John J. Fisher Jr. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Nominated (diff) by 173.175.200.238 for the following reason: Although I see that state legislators are "presumed" to have notability, my understanding is that under WP:GNG that is not guaranteed. In this specific case, the person in question was only in office for less than a day, appointed to fill in for someone who resigned.
I have no opinion of my own at this time. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:12, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Entertainment, and Illinois. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:17, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: If he doesn't surpass WP:NOPAGE, then an WP:ATD is a redirect to 100th Illinois General Assembly. Ultra-short term politicians certainly have the capacity to be notable (see List of members of the United States Congress by brevity of service, for instance), so that argument alone isn't enough. Curbon7 (talk) 08:18, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- Given the topic and the available recent citations, I'm not even sure that that would be the best target. Following the nominator's argument that the political stint isn't notable, the best target would therefore be List of Jeopardy! contestants. microbiologyMarcus [petri dish·growths] 12:36, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, speedy close. With respect to WP:NPOL the fact that he did serve is backed up by reliable (yet primary) sources in the article. With respect to the other reason the subject is known, I'll give the best[a] WP:THREE so far:
- Cuevas, Jailene (July 16, 2024). "Jeopardy! host Ken Jennings takes 'cheap shot directed' at Illinois contestant and former senator". The Mirror US. Daily Mirror.
- Lusk, Darian (18 July 2024). "Jeopardy! champ Jay Fisher nabs 3rd win despite 'unfairly difficult' last rounds". The U.S. Sun. The Sun.
- Holmes, Martin (18 July 2024). "'Jeopardy!' Champ Jay Fisher Reveals Shocking Connection to Elvis Presley". TV Insider.
- Given the above and the fact that the subject did hold office (albeit extremely briefly), I would also look to the guidance on WP:NOPAGE and think there's an argument that, even if all the sourcing stopped today,[b] there is still justification for a standalone permanent stub. I think we can take the weight of presumably from WP:NPOL and the argument from the basic criteria that says "If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability;" such that, combined, there is reason to believe the subject notable here.
- Further, I do believe there is precedent for NPOL, especially at the state level, requiring less SIGCOV than the GNG would otherwise require. This, I believe, is the main justification of the IP's argument for deletion, and the weight given to presumed. This argument is made with respect to WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, but that the fact that the many politician state level stub categories exist and that the articles in those categories are presumed notable with minimal sourcing should demonstrate the implicit consensus about the required threshold for notability of senators at the state level. microbiologyMarcus [petri dish·growths] 14:59, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep meets WP:NPOL. The brevity of the term seems to me to make him more notable, not less (it's unusually short). TulsaPoliticsFan (talk) 21:47, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:NPOL. The coverage of him as a Jeopardy champ is just the cherry on top. BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 02:41, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Notes
- ^ I say best knowing the tabloid nature of the present list at the time of writing, giving it truly in the spirit of WP:THREE, "Be honest with yourself about how good they are."
- ^ While there is no crystal ball, as the current champion, it is likely there will be further coverage, adding to the breadth of trivial coverage. I don't make a WP:TOOSOON argument here, as it would cut both ways: the subject loses soon, it's not likely to get more coverage; the subject continues to win, coverage would be expected to continue.
- Keep per MicrobiologyMarcus. Subject passes WP:NPOL, and arguably WP:GNG as well. Sal2100 (talk) 15:48, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- Technology Connections (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I follow this channel and had the redlink watchlisted, so I was cautiously optimistic to see it turn blue. But unfortunately I don't think it's reached notability yet. The existing sources are all primary links to the channel itself, and a BEFORE search for others turned up only interviews on other YouTube channels I wouldn't consider sufficiently reliable (e.g. [1][2], a one-paragraph entry at [3] that's borderline for SIGCOV, and short summaries of videos like [4][5] that either aren't SIGCOV or aren't RS or both. Sdkb talk 00:28, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, and Technology. Sdkb talk 00:34, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- weak keep: I'm a fan of his youtube channel, but it's hard to find things about it. This seems like a RS [6], a few hits in The Verge which is a RS [7], [8] and this which I think is also a RS [9]. We probably have at least enough for a basic article about this person, or the youtube channel he hosts. Oaktree b (talk) 00:47, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete I am also a fan of his YouTube channel but the sources provided thus far are not sufficient to meet WP:GNG. ElKevbo (talk) 00:59, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Internet, and Illinois. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:30, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- Unfortunately weak delete. The DigitalCameraWorld source above is the only one that qualifies for a full unit of SIGCOV, while the rest don't quite meet the mark, even when combined. Aaron Liu (talk) 21:10, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Midwest Rugby League (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article has minimal sources and said sources only talk about exhibition games ahead of planed launches of the competition. Google search only bring up the Wikipedia page, Facebook page, and USARL Page which has nothing on it. Fails WP:GNG. Mn1548 (talk) 11:08, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Rugby league and United States of America. Shellwood (talk) 12:45, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Illinois, and Ohio. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:11, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:49, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- Greg Koukl (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of notability, warning has been in place for over 7 years. I cannot find sources to indicate notability has been attained since the last nomination in 2011, which was closed as no consensus. glman (talk) 18:43, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 July 9. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:12, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Weak delete: Rather prolific author and is talked about a ton in the religious media, but a distinct lack of book reviews in "mainstream" media (for lack of a better word). This [10] review in religious media is typical... Some scattered mentions here [11] or [12]. We'd need more of these last two types of sources for this to have a chance to be notable here. Was hoping this would pass AUTHOR. Oaktree b (talk) 00:15, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Radio, Christianity, California, and Illinois. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:08, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. I have added another reference which squeezes him over the line on WP:GNG. But the Google scholar citations are actually pretty good, including 98 for Tactics. StAnselm (talk) 23:13, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep as has good cites for two of his books as per Google Scholar here and coverage in reliable sources such as The Christian Post, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 18:20, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep:He's made STR. He's notable. Quote Veteran (talk) 18:48, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:52, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: Per above. ADifferentMan (talk) 07:14, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- Prashanth Venkataramanujam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable BLP. Sources relate either to Patriot Act or Hasan Minhaj. – Broccoli & Coffee (Oh hai) 21:11, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Patriot Act with Hasan Minhaj, you mean? And he might mean WP:CREATIVE as creator/writer of this series... -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 13:07, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Television. – Broccoli & Coffee (Oh hai) 21:11, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:04, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 19:59, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:19, 11 July 2024 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 20:25, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to Patriot_Act_with_Hasan_Minhaj#Production: which seems to be what he is notable for so far. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 20:31, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- I agree with the redirect proposed above. Drmies (talk) 22:46, 21 July 2024 (UTC)