Jump to content

Steward requests/Permissions/2013-08

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

Administrator access

Soul Train bxr@wikipedia

I request to prolong my access for 3 more months. For the last 3 months in bxr.wikipedia has changed interface from English to Russian, so this was good change. But I still waiting for changing of namespaces to Buryat language. Untill this, I can't say that my mission is finished. Also, I desided to permanently ban user Gubin Michail because of his constantly violations. Please, let me know if I do it wrong. Soul Train (talk) 08:36, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi, please make a local announcement about this request nevertheless, even if there is no community. --MF-W 00:13, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
Here's the link--Soul Train (talk) 08:10, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Oppose. This is not active user in latest week's. In 30 days, he make 41 edits. He remove 700 articles and blocked the most active and promising participant in perpetuity once the ban to edit him discussion page, and send the letter.--Region190 (talk) 19:14, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
These alleged 700 articles seem to be empty pages. --Vituzzu (talk) 16:39, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
In lezgin wikipedia too many there pages, but Soul Train don't remove it.--Region190 (talk) 17:13, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
What? You have no right to talk about this one of the best newly opened Wikimedia project. This is the real Diamond with native users who want to develop their Wikipedia. If I see garbage somewhere, I delete it, no matter if it Russian, Buryat, Chechen, Lezgi, Avar or another language section.--Soul Train (talk) 11:45, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
  • I think that everybody in the Meta knows my good intentions and experience in working to support different sections of Wikipedia in languages of Russian Federation. Also, everybody knows that I never hold for the technical permissions. I'm proud that I deleted this garbage and also I can say that I warned about this possible deletion during the voting. I have done everything to prevent this deletion, but Mr. Gubin done nothing to expand his blanked pages with 1-2 words (I can't call it "articles"). Unfortunately, nobody wants to develop this section and I do not exclude that once Buryat Wikipedia can be transferring back to the Incubator. I want to help to all Wikipedias in languages of Russian Federation, but only if native speakers themselves want to develop their projects. About Region190, I don't even want to discuss this schoolboy (familiar of permanently banned in Russian and Buryat Wikipedia user Gubin) who simply chasing for permissions in almost dead projects.--Soul Train (talk) 11:29, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
Strongly Oppose Oppose. This user became an admin. After that he changet interface to RUSSIAN, and lots of buryats live in China or Mongolia and don't speak russian. Then he deleted more than 300 pages, wich wore stubs. Then he wasn't active AT ALL! I was an admin of buryat Wikipedia before him. I added to a page about russian musition Vicktor Coj link to my translation to buryat his song on YouTube and this vandal blocked me indefinately! NO WAY!--Gubin (talk) 15:31, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
Can somebody globally ban user Губин Михаил, because he indefinitely banned in two Wikimedia Projects at the moment - in Russian and in Buryat Wikipedia?--Soul Train (talk) 08:37, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
  • I need extra permissions immidiately! At the moment all namespaces finally were translated and moved fromm Translatewiki. This paragraph of my program of developing of Buryat Wikipedia was successfully completed. Now I should fix the bags in some system messages and in Sidebar 'cause now it doesn't work correctly.--Soul Train (talk) 08:32, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Or can somebody fix the Sidebar - now Special:RescentChanges and Special:NewPages called in Russian «Служебная:», it needed to fix - «Тусхай:».--Soul Train (talk) 08:42, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Please, close this request. I don't want to take part in the farce, when many users, even if they really want to help another small projects, came in some almost dead project and elect the Administrator. If you don't want to prolong my permissions, well, let it be. Every regular user in Russian Wikipedias knows about vandals like Gubin, Region190 and their band. They don't care about quality of Wikipedia, simply schoolboys who want to socialise in wiki-projects. And I don't want to spend my time in wars with those boys. This is the first thing. Second, Buryat Wikipedia is really dead project that nobody wants to develop. Making pages like "Rwanda - African country" was not developing of project.--Soul Train (talk) 12:30, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
Not done at this time. Please return this conversation to the bxrwiki and have the nomination process and conversation there. This page is not the right page to undertaken the debate. Please let the conversation run at least a week. — billinghurst sDrewth 16:32, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
I repeat, I don't want to be sysop in this absolutely dead project. At the same time, I'll check that vandal users such Region190 or Gubin Michail never take the power there.--Soul Train (talk) 06:32, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

आशीष भटनागर@hiwikipedia

This user has a successful RfA with nine support and one neutral !votes. Results are summarised in a table at the bottom of the discussion.--Bill william compton (talk) 05:28, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

I have been reading the discussion through Google Translate (which is of course error-prone) and found the following votes for आशीष भटनागर: Sanjeev Kumar, Mala Chaubey, Hunnjazal, अनुनाद सिंह, Kramtlverma, Hemant wikikosh (6). Could you tell me which ones I missed? --MF-W 00:51, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
I thought it would happen. Support !votes: Sanjeev Kumar, Mala Chaubey, Hunnjazal, अनुनाद सिंह, Kramtlverma, Hemant wikikosh, अजीत कुमार तिवारी, me (Bill william compton) and Siddhartha Ghai; neutral !vote: Hindustanilanguage. Also, this user was (mysteriously) stripped of his admin rights, can you tell me the real reason behind it (according to the latest log)? Regards.--Bill william compton (talk) 10:49, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the clarification. The reason for the removal in the log is "expired", please see the archive: It seems like there was some confusion whether he was granted permanent or temporary adminship.
Done. --MF-W 00:02, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Siddhartha Ghai@hiwikipedia

This user has a successful RfA with the full support of Hindi Wikipedia community. Results are summarised in a table at the bottom of the discussion.--Bill william compton (talk) 05:28, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Same as above, I found Sanjeev Kumar, Mala Chaubey, Hunnjazal, अनुनाद सिंह, Kramtlverma, आशीष भटनागर and Hemant wikikosh (7). Which ones are missing? --MF-W 00:51, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Support !votes: Sanjeev Kumar, Mala Chaubey, Hunnjazal, अनुनाद सिंह, Kramtlverma, आशीष भटनागर, Hemant wikikosh, me, अजीत कुमार तिवारी and Hindustanilanguage.--Bill william compton (talk) 10:52, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Done --MF-W 00:03, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Sersan Mayor Kururu@suwikipedia

Article in need of deletion piling up, anonymous users attacking key templates, featured article and picture templates sometimes don't get renewed, several interface haven't been translated, while no sysop actively solving them. I think finally I am justifiable to be one. :) Sersan Mayor Kururu (talk) 07:31, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

You listed this under the CheckUser requests, but the discussion does not seem to be for CheckUser rights. In addition it does not meet the Foundation requirements for CheckUser access. I presume you are requesting administrator access. If so, there is an active bureaucrat on suwiki who will deal with this QuiteUnusual (talk) 14:25, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
OK, so Sersan Mayor must request his rights to the local 'crat. I'll help him. SpartacksCompatriot (talk) 16:14, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Ayie7791 ace@wikipedia

I see at this time is really critical the existence of a local admin on the ace.wikipedia, so back I volunteered to be an admin. For the cooperation and his consent I say thank you. Ayie7791 (talk) 19:45, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Seeing no opposition, I recommend temporary administrator first. Having limited active users may make granting permanent flag too early.--Jusjih (talk) 03:11, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Oppose to promote any users to admin on acewiki right now. See the previous admin requests here (Ayie7791), here (Si Gam) and here (GabTHAT). Trijnsteltalk 15:31, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
For what reason? And until when? -- Si Gam (talk) 11:43, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
If you accuse for the same reason, please do check user soon! -- Si Gam (talk) 10:40, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
What does it mean we deserve blacklisted users? For what reason we do not have a right to participate more in the places where we contribute in it? -- Ayie7791 (talk) 16:31, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
Please check IP from all our contributions too. -- Si Gam (talk) 17:08, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Comment Comment I believe that the comment is that there has been general problems with acewiki and administration, and that it is probably prudent to not appoint any admins at this time due to the general issues and disagreements. — billinghurst sDrewth 16:34, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
OK. I suggest this Wikipedia should be closed.. :) -- Si Gam (talk) 07:39, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

There are many projects that do not have admins which work just fine. If the members of acewiki are truly interested in building the project, I am certain there is plenty that can be done without a sysop flag. -- Avi (talk) 00:49, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Hehe, could you tell me who can maintain main page, media wiki etc if there is no native admin? -- Si Gam (talk) 20:31, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Stewards or possibly global sysops. Please see Steward requests/Miscellaneous. -- Avi (talk) 03:43, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Do they know Acehnese so they can know which part should be edited? -- Si Gam (talk) 07:39, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Not done due to, once more, high sockpuppet abuse suspicion. Many small wikis have global sysops, and this one is no exception. Elfix 09:12, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Sockpuppet again? How do you prove it? Please do not accuse us. -- Si Gam (talk) 13:01, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
It can be proven by just looking at this request. Razorflame 22:43, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Hat600@zh.wikisource

DS-fax 06:57, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Done Bennylin 10:46, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

MADe@be.wikimedia.org

Admin rights necessary to remove the continuous spam, and to remove some attachments that were uploaded and contain privacy related material. I'm the main proponent of the planned Belgian chapter, and I informed the community on the comm. portal MADe (talk) 08:17, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

There are local bureaucrats. Why do not you ask them? Ruslik (talk) 10:59, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
There is also a procedure: wmbe:Wikimedia:Access. Romaine (talk) 11:21, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Not done, should be done by local bureaucrats (and hardly feedback on wmbe:Community portal btw). Trijnsteltalk 15:51, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Bureaucrat access

Paulis@dewikisource

Please, grant bureaucrat rights to this user, who was accepted after a voting with 100 % (18 votes, 2 weeks). De.Wikisouurce has 2 bureaucrates. One is inactive since 2006 (Jofi), one not very active (Finanzer). Therefore a second active bureaucrat is needed. Paulis is bureaucrat also in De.Wikiquote. Thanks! --FrobenChristoph (talk) 19:10, 23 August 2013 (UTC) (Admin at De.Wikisource)

Erledigt --MF-W 18:53, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

CheckUser access

Sadrettin@trwikipedia

Sadrettin was elect checkuser in Turkish Wikipedia, according voting (27/0/0). Thank you, regards. Sadrettin (talk) 18:25, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

 On hold pending identification. Trijnsteltalk 19:14, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
OK. will be sent to the. --Sadrettin (talk) 19:33, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
See the two emails with instructions I send to you and reply to the second one. ;) Trijnsteltalk 19:34, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
Done (I'll accept you for CU-l and do the other stuff). Trijnsteltalk 20:47, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
Thank you. --Sadrettin (talk) 14:05, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

LFaraone@enwiki

LFaraone has already identified to the Wikimedia Foundation. Following the results of our project's 2013 CU/OS Appointments process, please assign the CheckUser permission to his Enwiki account. For the Arbitration Committee, AGK [•] 00:02, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Done. Trijnsteltalk 10:10, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Materialscientist@enwiki

This request is made pending Materialscientist's satisfactory identification to the Wikimedia Foundation. Following the results of our project's 2013 CU/OS Appointments process, and once he has identified, please assign the CheckUser permission to his Enwiki account. For the Arbitration Committee, AGK [•] 00:02, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Identified to the foundation [3] John F. Lewis (talk) 00:12, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
Done. Trijnsteltalk 10:10, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

NativeForeigner@enwiki

NativeForeigner has already identified to the Wikimedia Foundation. Following the results of our project's 2013 CU/OS Appointments process, please assign the CheckUser permission to his Enwiki account. For the Arbitration Committee, AGK [•] 00:02, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Done. Trijnsteltalk 10:10, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Reaper Eternal@enwiki

Reaper Eternal has already identified to the Wikimedia Foundation. Following the results of our project's 2013 CU/OS Appointments process, please assign the CheckUser permission to his Enwiki account. For the Arbitration Committee, AGK [•] 00:02, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Done. Trijnsteltalk 10:10, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Oversight access

Deskana@enwiki

Identifed here. I am a member of the Arbitration Committee, announcing this on behalf of the Committee. NW (Talk) 02:11, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Done --MF-W 02:17, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

User PierreSelim@commons

Please grant right to user. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

 On hold pending identification. --MF-W 15:13, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
I see he still hasn't send his ID, but PierreSelim told me on 6 August that he would do that ASAP... Trijnsteltalk 22:19, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
Sorry, I did not had the occasion to discuss with Philippe during Wikimania, and I was in mainland of China for the last week (i.e. without real internet). The Copy of my passeport has been sent today to the WMF by email. Sorry for the delay. --PierreSelim (talk) 14:17, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
His ID is received and posted to the identification noticeboard. Philippe (WMF) (talk) 07:20, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
Done Matanya (talk) 07:23, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

DoRD@enwiki

Thank you --Risker (talk) 00:00, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Done. Trijnsteltalk 10:22, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Elockid@enwiki

Thank you --Risker (talk) 00:00, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Done. Trijnsteltalk 10:22, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

GorillaWarfare@enwiki

Thank you --Risker (talk) 00:00, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Done. Trijnsteltalk 10:22, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Ks0stm@enwiki

Thank you --Risker (talk) 00:00, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Done. Trijnsteltalk 10:22, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

LFaraone@enwiki

Thank you --Risker (talk) 00:00, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Done. Trijnsteltalk 10:22, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Removal of access

Aschmidt@dewikiversity

Please remove my bureaucrat and sysop rights on German Wikiversity. — Thanks!--Aschmidt (talk) 20:33, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

 On hold for 24 h per standard practice. --MF-W 20:37, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Done, thank you for your service. --MF-W 00:09, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Merlissimo@wikidatawiki

Less than 10 actions in the past 6 months. John F. Lewis (talk) 00:00, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

I read that "Admin accounts are checked for inactivity on a monthly basis", will there be a centralised check on wikidata? --Bencmq (talk) 15:23, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
This page updates regularly, but I think we plan on alerting this page once a month (on the 1st) if any admin is below the threshold of 10 edits in 6 months. Delusion23 (talk) 17:23, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Done, please thank him for his service. --MF-W 00:14, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Ferdi, Heretik, Igor & Missmarple @sl.wikipedia

I request a removal of sysop status for above listed admins and 'crats (Igor and Heretik are bureaucrats) due to their inactivity. Reason: After long discussion at local village pump (here and here) we decided to have a vote on a policy regarding inactive admins and/or crats in SL:WP. Voting can be seen here. According to elected policy sysops loose their status after two years of inactivity. All four users were notified via their talk pages about this policy one month ago and were asked to respond; there was no objection. Regards, MZaplotnik (contribs) 13:16, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Done --MF-W 00:23, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
Thank you. MZaplotnik (contribs) 07:25, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Wvk@dewikiversity

Please remove my bureaucrat and sysop rights on German Wikiversity. — Thanks! --Wvk (talk) 04:47, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Done and thank you for efforts. Bennylin 12:13, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Swedish Wikipedia

On the Swedish Wikipedia all admins/bureaucrats/CU/OS are elected for one year at a time, see the policy document. There exists a possibility to be reelected, but some users choose not to apply for another period. To get reelected at least 75 percent support is required. --Lavallen 08:37, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

AlphaZeta@svwiki
Done. Bennylin 13:24, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Bensin@svwiki
Done. Bennylin 13:24, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Dh8b@svwiki
Done. Bennylin 13:24, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Green Yoshi@svwiki
Done. Bennylin 13:24, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Papper@svwiki
Done. Bennylin 13:24, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Warrakkk@svwiki
Done. Bennylin 13:24, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Diupwijk@svwiki
Done. -- Mentifisto 18:18, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
Evalowyn@svwiki
Done. -- Mentifisto 18:18, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
Jordgubbe@svwiki
Done. -- Mentifisto 18:18, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
Julle@svwiki
Done. -- Mentifisto 18:18, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
A clearification: The user has responded, but not given a clear yes to accept a new period as sysop. A new RfA have to take place anyway and the tools can be easily be regranted to him locally. -- Lavallen 12:22, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Morza@eswikipedia

Please remove my bureaucrat and sysop rights on Spanish Wikipedia. — Thanks! --Morza (sono qui) 10:04, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Done. And thanks for your services. Bennylin 07:28, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Mnd@jawiki

He/she does/did not have edit activities for three months since 2013-05-04T12:17:55. According to de-sysop policy of ja.wikiprdia, I request to remove his/her sysop access. Thank you. -Vigorous action (talk) 14:10, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Really? You only require 3 months of inactivity before removing someone's sysop status there? I would've liked to have seen more like 6 months inactivity... Razorflame 20:59, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
The community decision of jawiki does not depend on what you like... --MF-W 21:01, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
Of course it doesn't. I was just making a comment. Razorflame 23:31, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Done Please thank the user for his or her contributions. -- Avi (talk) 00:55, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Resped@eswikipedia

User did not managed to attain the minimum percentage of votes required by local policy, and therefore their sysop and bureaucrat flags must be removed. --LlamaAl (talk) 21:34, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Done --MF-W 23:24, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Marcos Elias de Oliveira Júnior@pt.wikipedia

Please, remove my sysop status at pt.wikipedia. Thanks! Marcos Elias de Oliveira Júnior (talk) 22:41, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Done Thank you for your work! -- Avi (talk) 01:13, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Manscher@dawikipedia

Users own request. http://da.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brugerdiskussion:Manscher&diff=prev&oldid=7246002. --Christian Giersing (talk) 09:26, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Done. --MF-W 01:45, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Abisys@it.wikipedia

Please, remove my sysop status at it.wikipedia. Thanks! --Abisys (talk) 11:08, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 15:08, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks Ruslik. --Abisys (talk) 20:33, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Viniciusmc@ptwikipedia

Viniciusmc has abused multiple accounts to harass another pt.wiki user. He can be linked with Cotiatia, that was indefinitely blocked and then he created Slovski, that repeated the same insults and harassment. Misuse of multiple accounts is a reason for immediate removal (link).—Teles «Talk to me ˱@ L C S˲» 01:35, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Done --MF-W 01:39, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

John F. Lewis@wikidatawiki

Self request really. Loss of access to the tools and carrying out community entrusted processes will be best for me for the next month or two. Small recent stress with Wikidata and enwiki slightly pushed me to this. Removal of sysop rights only. Administrators can self assign translation admin and since this is going to be temp, I am sure there are no problems with me keeping this right. John F. Lewis (talk) 02:33, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Withdrawn, Not done. Trijnsteltalk 13:00, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Adrignola@enwikibooks

Please remove Administrator, Bureaucrat, and CheckUser. I no longer have the time to effectively hold these positions. --– Adrignola talk 08:31, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Sorry to see you go, I'm not actioning this one as I'm a contributor to the project. See you back sometime - QuiteUnusual (talk) 08:59, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
Done :-( Best of luck with things that are keeping you busy, and hope that it is not a complete withdrawal. — billinghurst sDrewth 09:04, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Adrignola@commons

Please remove Administrator and OTRS members. I no longer have the time to effectively hold these positions. --– Adrignola talk 08:31, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

You will need to request OTRS Member removal locally at Commons; it can't be done from Meta. QuiteUnusual (talk) 09:03, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
Done and I will post a message at Commons. — billinghurst sDrewth 09:05, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Sotiale@bi.wikipedia

Please remove sysop status. Thank you for helping.. --Sotiale (talk) 08:58, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Done, thanks for your service as an admin. --MF-W 19:48, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Silver Spoon@nl.wikipedia

Please remove my administrator flag on nl.wikipedia, i'm not that active as i used to be. Silver Spoon (talk) 13:25, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

  • If this is your wish so be it but please reconsider since you are active enough and always have been a good admin regarding work and ethics and a very decent colleague. I hope this can be put on hold for some time. Kind regards, MoiraMoira (talk) 07:04, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Done deflagging after 62 hours have passed. Best wish.--Jusjih (talk) 03:26, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Smooth O, Demicx, Emir Kotromanić, EmirA & Squirrel @bs.wikipedia

Please remove these users admin/bureaucrat status:

--DzWiki (talk) 13:30, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Question Question: Demicx is also a checkuser, does this mean he should lose these rights too? (he hasn't used them for 2 years iirc) If so, Kal-El will lose them too (every project should have at least 2 CUs or none at all) and the project will have no local checkusers anymore so maybe you should think about electing new (and active!) CUs. Trijnsteltalk 16:49, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Correct, he should also lose his CU-rights. Can we put Demicx "on hold", I would like to hear what the bs.wp community have to say about this. If problems doesn't exist with the other users, please remove their rights. --DzWiki (talk) 10:53, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Sure. Four Done and Demicx put  On hold.
Let me tell you that both Demicx and Kal-El (the other CU) haven't used their tools for since 2011. We have also a global CU policy which says that everyone who has not used their tools for 1 year will lose them. In case no new CU will be elected, the stewards will be able to CU per request. Our request page is here. Trijnsteltalk 18:05, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
You can remove Demicx rights too. If the community on bs.wp wants new CU we can "elect" them later, you don't need to wait on us. Thanks for your help --DzWiki (talk) 17:22, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
OK, Done. Bswiki has no CUs anymore, so request a CU from now on on Steward requests/Checkuser please. Trijnsteltalk 17:39, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Pruneau@commons

Thank you. --– Kwj2772 (msg) 10:42, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 07:24, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Arie@he.wiktionary

Please remove admin+bureaucrat statuses. In the discussion we voted to remove the statuses of all the inactive functionaries. User:Arie is inactive for more than 6 years, and resigned the beurocrat position in 2009 (he:wikt:ויקימילון:מזנון/ארכיון 17#פרישה מתפקיד הבירוקרט).
Thanks, 132.76.81.221 22:17, 25 August 2013 (UTC) (he:wikt:user:כחלון)

Last time he edited was on 2009-03-06, so I think you meant 4 years inactivity. Bennylin 11:31, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Done. Bennylin 11:32, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks a lot! 132.76.81.221 10:10, 28 August 2013 (UTC) (he:wikt:user:כחלון)

עמשׂ בן־אריה@he.wiktionary

Please remove admin status. In the discussion we voted to remove the statuses of all the inactive functionaries. The user is inactive since December 2012. He didn't vote in the discussion, but remarked "I wanted to say you did the right thing, and I agree with this decision".
Thanks, 132.76.81.221 22:17, 25 August 2013 (UTC) (he:wikt:user:כחלון)

Done. Bennylin 11:32, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks a lot! 132.76.81.221 10:10, 28 August 2013 (UTC) (he:wikt:user:כחלון)

LightBringer@he.wiktionary

Please remove adminstatus. In the discussion we voted to remove the statuses of all the inactive functionaries. The user is inactive since March 2013. Wrote to me "I think it's right to remove my status, and make room to more active users".
Thanks, 132.76.81.221 22:17, 25 August 2013 (UTC) (he:wikt:user:כחלון)

Done. Bennylin 11:32, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks a lot! 132.76.81.221 10:10, 28 August 2013 (UTC) (he:wikt:user:כחלון)

Marmzok@ckb.wikipedia

Hello. Please remove the inactive user from administrator flag per local consensus. No sysop activity for 1 year. Thank you.--Calak (talk) 07:36, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Is there any local inactivity policy. Ruslik (talk) 15:07, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
I am sysop there. We give our policy from en.wiki. He has not any sysop activity for more than 1 year and his sysop right should be revoked per both policy and local consensus.--Calak (talk) 15:34, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
 On hold until at least 2013-08-22.--Jusjih (talk) 17:04, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
Please check this request.--Calak (talk) 08:38, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

We also resolved a local policy to desysopping inactive administrator who has not made 100 changes or administrator actions combined for at least one year (discussion page: Village pump (policy) and now it is available in Wikipedia:Administrators). Thank you.--Calak (talk) 06:48, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

I don't know why you don't perform this request. You want local consensus, it is available, you need local policy, we provide it. User is inactive and has 0 sysop activity for more than 14 months. What do you want really? What is the problem? Please don't waste our time by holding this petty request. Now our community is await, we need new and active sysop for expanding our project. Thank you for your understanding.--Calak (talk) 10:58, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
Has Marmzok been informed about this request? Ruslik (talk) 06:04, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
Informing user doesn't change the policy or local consensus (and also not mentioned in our policy), however I informed him.--Calak (talk) 09:01, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
His answer: "I don't have any problem with this decision".--Calak (talk) 16:37, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
Done Ruslik (talk) 05:51, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Thank you.--Calak (talk) 07:03, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Apoltix@dawikipedia

Inactive since Jan 30, 2013. Please remove sysop flag. Regards Christian Giersing (talk) 07:57, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Done Ruslik (talk) 07:21, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Elen of the Roads@enwiki

The Arbitration Committee has voted to remove Elen of the Roads' CheckUser and Oversight permissions (for inactivity). For the Arbitration Committee, AGK [•] 00:00, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Done. Trijnsteltalk 10:25, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

MODCHK@en.wikisource

Hesperian 03:13, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 07:24, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Temporary permissions (expired and rejected requests only)

زكريا@sowikipedia

Zack (talk) 17:42, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2013-07-30. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. --MF-W 01:41, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
extended to 2014-02-05.--Jusjih (talk) 01:51, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

odisha1@wiktionary

request for syop --Srikant Kedia 16:59, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Done One year of temporary adminship granted. Expires on 3 August 2013. --Millosh (talk) 01:13, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
removed. Matanya (talk) 17:07, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

pedram.salehpoor@fawikibooks

My temporary admin access is going to be finished as such I request it to be extended for another period. I only just now realized it is going to be finished so the discussion page is new. Pedram.salehpoor (talk) 14:36, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

 On hold until 2 Aug. Bencmq (talk) 03:51, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Done Granted for 1 year to expire on 2013-08-03. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. -Barras talk 08:51, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

removed. Matanya (talk) 17:07, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Zylbath@nds.wiktionary

Done. One year of temporary adminship. Expires on 5 August 2013. User looks like the only one active on the wiki. (For the record: permissions wasn't changed.) --Millosh (talk) 02:07, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

removed --MF-W 15:21, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

User Edinwiki@bs.wikiquote

Edinwiki (talk) 17:32, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Taking into account the level of support that you have received in that discussion, only a temporary adminship of 3 months duration is warranted. Ruslik (talk) 16:04, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
See reply at request Edinwiki@bs.wiktionary. -- Edinwiki (talk) 23:56, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
Taken into account the user is holding the same rights on multiple projects, Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2013-08-05. . --Bencmq (talk) 05:21, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

removed --MF-W 15:21, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Amqui@chy.wikipedia

Request for my temporary adminship to be renewed on Tsétsêhéstâhese Wikipedia. Thanks, Amqui (talk) 02:27, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2013-08-05. — T. 06:42, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
Thanks, Amqui (talk) 22:52, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

removed --MF-W 15:21, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Дагиров Умар@ce.wiki

Greetings! Please grant me an access to the administrative rights at the Chechen Wikipedia for 6 months. I need it for deleting, restoring and (un-)protecting pages, (un-)blocking users (especially unblocking users, who have been blocked by previous admins for no valid reason), editing MediaWiki namespace etc. Due to decision stated here, I have requested the status locally, and received sufficient support (7 "pro" to 0 "oppose"), mostly from active contributors. I have already received an access previously.--Дагиров Умар (talk) 18:37, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2013-08-07. Per point #4 of this RFC, all initial administrators will be on a temporary basis. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 18:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Good! Thank you very much. -- Дагиров Умар (talk) 23:13, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

removed --MF-W 22:00, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Дядя Фред@ce.wiki

I requst adminship for me in Chechen Wikipedia. I am a closer in ruWiki and cheWiki common voted for me as 0 votes oppose. Thanx for my very bad English. Дядя Фред (talk) 17:26, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2013-08-07. Per point #4 of this RFC, all initial administrators will be on a temporary basis. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 18:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

removed --MF-W 22:00, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Sarrus@dawiktionary

I have consensus to continue as sysop.
- Sarrus (ct) 14:44, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Done. Extended up to 10 August 2013. --Millosh (talk) 16:05, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

extended per a subsequent new request. --MF-W 01:38, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Maksat@kywiki

Hi friends, I would like you to give me consent to continue my powers in the administration ky.wikipedia. If it is possible for the long term. Late in August I will not have the status of the administrator. Thank you in advance.

 On hold until 11 August. Maksat, please ask locally for confirmation at least 8 days before the expiration date. You'll get one year this time if other users from ky.wp are fine with that. --Millosh (talk) 21:11, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi Millosh, I have already appealed to the local community, here is the link: discission for administration for Kyrgyz Wikipedia. Thank you,Maksat (talk) 05:45, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
I saw that, but we need to wait more than one day to see if everybody agrees with your adminship. Usually, it's 7 full days. This time I shortened the process on five days because you'd lose admin permissions on 12 August. Next time, please, make the local request at least 8 days before the expiration date for your adminship. --Millosh (talk) 07:42, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
Oh sorry, I did not know, next time I will write in advance, Maksat (talk) 06:30, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Done. Enough of time passed. User has support by three native speakers and likely the only active users presently. Lasts until 12 August 2013. --Millosh (talk) 23:26, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

extended --MF-W 18:49, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Pratyya Ghosh@bn-wiktionary

Hey I requested adminship on bn.wiktionary and got local support from the local community I don't know how I got that support. But I want this right for the sake of that wiktionary. Because there are no one available. Only admin is not available. That's why I want this right.--Pratyya (Hello!) 12:08, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

I can give you a temporal sysop access for 3 months. Ruslik (talk) 19:18, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Okay. No problem--Pratyya (Hello!) 07:05, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2013-08-12. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Ruslik (talk) 15:49, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
Note: sole supporter only has two edits on the request and one on their userpage. -- Mentifisto 16:05, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
removed. Ruslik (talk) 14:57, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Санюн Вадик@mhr-wikipedia

 On hold until 18 May 2013. Ruslik (talk) 15:57, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2013-08-18. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Ruslik (talk) 12:26, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
Ok. Thank you. I start to work. --Санюн Вадик (talk) 12:52, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
removed.--Jusjih (talk) 17:11, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Sotiale@bi.wikipedia

I request temporary adminship on Bislama Wikipedia again. past request is here. If can, I hope 6 months temporary. Thank you. Sotiale (talk) 14:23, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2013-12-05. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Ruslik (talk) 19:02, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

removed early after user request. --MF-W 19:47, 25 August 2013 (UTC)


Miscellaneous requests

CalakBot@ckbwikipedia

Hello. Please grant "bot with administrator rights" to CalakBot (Not "administrator" right, but "bot with administrator rights"; it has only few rights of administrators). Thank you very much.--Calak (talk) 14:26, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 12:43, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
Thank you Ruslik.--Calak (talk) 13:54, 14 August 2013 (UTC)