Steward requests/Permissions: Difference between revisions

==== Username@xxproject ====
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- don't change this line -->
 |domain    = <!-- such as en.wikibooks -->
 |user name = 
 |discussion= 
}}
(your remarks) ~~~~

==== User name@xxproject ====
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    =
 |user name =
 |discussion= 
}}

Administrator access

BeGasy@mgwikipedia

In absence of bureaucrats, and on behalf of mg:user:BeGasy, I hereby request the administrator status for BeGasy on the Malagasy Wikipedia. He originally made the request a week ago. Thanks in advance,--BeGasy (talk) 13:29, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear BeGasy, you were blocked indefinitely on Wikimedia Commons due to repeated uploading of non-free files and two times block evasion. Could you please give your side of the story. What happened? Do you have any intention of uploading files on mg.wikipedia? Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 15:38, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pxos@fiwikiversity

Three months is not enough for the gargantuan task. I know already that I need more time to sort things out using sysop tools at fi.wikiversity. Please extend the temporary adminship to last for six months from the original date (i.e. ending 28 May 2016) and remove the previous expiry date from SRAT. The local announcement has been open for more than a week now. --Pxos (talk) 22:39, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is almost five months until the expiration of your access. Please, make any extension request in May. Ruslik (talk) 18:08, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The reasoning is false. The rights will expire in February. The community does not oppose this, so this is not a call that a steward can make. I'm being bold and have reversed the "not done" status, because this is simply an idiotic decision. --Pxos (talk) 19:41, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quote: "For temporary adminship please state for how long and for which tasks you need it, and link to a local announcement." I have now realized that I need the right for at least six months as I'm the only active administrator and there are so much to do. I have also provided a link to the local announcement where I have informed the community about my wish to extend the period. --Pxos (talk) 20:03, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You initial post was confusing - it was not clear what the date 28 May meant, although I do not want to call it "idiotic". Anyway it is a relatively long time until you temporal adminship expires, so, please, apply when it is close to the expiration. Ruslik (talk) 18:17, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I simply cannot see the point in this "please apply later" thing. I have originally made a personal error of judgment, where I thought that three months would be sufficient. I asked the rights for three months and told the local community that I would like to be your man for 3 months. Now I have come to the conclusion that I have made an error in the amount of work that is ahead of me, and I have already told the community that I would like to keep the rights for six months. As I have reached the conclusion and met all the requirements, which I won't repeat here, I have decided to ask that the rights be kept for six months altogether. Now for some unwritten rule a single steward forces me to wait for 40 days, and only then can I make another request and perhaps make another announcement to the community. Please tell me where the policy is written that governs this procedure. --Pxos (talk) 20:18, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 On hold until 28 February 2016. Ruslik (talk) 08:09, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, this doesn't make any sense. I hereby withdraw the application altogether. Feel free to mark this as "not done" so that it won't appear here unnecessarily for almost two months. --Pxos (talk) 21:22, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mohau@nso.wikipedia.org

Requesting admin rights to continue working on growing this wiki. — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mohau (talk)

Hi, please make a new local request/announcement. --MF-W 23:18, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sannita@napwikipedia

Requesting temporary admin right on nap.wiki to help the only two admins there. --Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 18:29, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 On hold until 9 Jan. - Taketa (talk) 19:10, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry! I miscounted the days. :( --Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 19:46, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Granted for 3 months to expire on 2016-04-09. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. - Taketa (talk) 15:29, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ninjastrikers@my.wikipedia

Requesting admin rights on my.wiki to improve maintenance. Ninja✮Strikers ^«☎» 08:44, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

{{tl:Onhold}} until 10 Jan. - Taketa (talk) 15:30, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Granted for 3 months to expire on 2016-04-10. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. -- Avi (talk) 05:32, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ochilov@uzwiktionary

Requesting sysop rights to help out with maintenance. Ochilov (talk) 06:25, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Granted for 3 months to expire on 2016-04-10. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. -- Avi (talk) 07:29, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bureaucrat access

CheckUser access

Arifys@map-bms.wikipedia

(Why I make this request? because I wanted to check out the new user who abuses his or her account and duplicate accounts. In map-bmswp my own, and no bureaucrat, but I am active at there. ) Thanks Arifys (talk) 15:18, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Arifys, you need two candidates and a large community that supports you, before making a request for access here. Please read CheckUser policy#Appointing local Checkusers. If you have a specific request for a checkuser on map-bms.wikipedia, you can ask a steward to do this at Steward requests/Checkuser. Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 15:27, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oversight access

Removal of access

Users who did not sign confidentiality agreement

For the record: I sent an email about this to the stewards mailing list and listing here for the record and for tracking purposes. These are users who have not signed the Confidentiality agreement required by the new Access to nonpublic information policy and are, therefore, no longer eligible to hold Checkuser or Oversight rights. There are a couple people who I have asked the Stewards to wait briefly while I try to work on them. Jalexander--WMF 02:44, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Status:    Not done Avocato (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA) (Checkuser) [I asked to wait for removal, reaching out for issue with signature]
• Status:    Done Barcex (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA) (Checkuser)
• Status:    Done Bawolff (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA) (Oversight) [I asked to wait for removal, but will probably release shortly]
• Status:    Done Deineka (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA) (Checkuser)
• Status:    Done Ha98574 (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA) (Checkuser)
• Status:    Done IvanLanin (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA) (Checkuser)
• Status:    Not done Kamix (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA) (Oversight) [I asked to wait for removal but will probably release shortly]
• Status:    Done Penn Station (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA) (Checkuser and Oversight)
• Status:    Done Sadrettin (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA) (Checkuser)
• Status:    Done Sotiale (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA) (Checkuser)
• Status:    Done Syp (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA) (Checkuser)
• Status:    Done Thenub314 (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA) (Checkuser)
• Status:    Done Wind (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA) (Checkuser)
• Status:    Done พุทธามาตย์ (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA) (Checkuser) [I asked to wait for removal, but will probably release shortly]
• Status:    On hold Bináris2 (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA) (Checkuser) [I asked to wait for removal, reaching out for issue with signature]

Five requests on hold. The rest was done by Jyothis. - Taketa (talk) 10:20, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that when the rights from Bawolff (enwikinews OS), Kamix (fawiki OS) and พุทธามาตย์ (thwiki CU) are removed, the following rights also need to be removed until a new CU/OS has been elected or until the aforementioned users signed the confidentiality agreement:

•    Removed Cspurrier (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA) (oversight)

*ظهیری (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA) (oversight)

•    Removed Octahedron80 (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA) (checkuser)

There always need to be at least two checkusers and/or oversighters for mutual accountability per CU/OS policy. Trijnstel_talk 12:04, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• User:Kamix has now signed the request for their rights to be removed is withdrawn. Jalexander--WMF 22:04, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Noting this request on en.wikinews and Meta. --Rschen7754 18:57, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • Based on that I have removed Bawolff's right and also those of Cspurrier who was the only remaining OS on en.wikinews. --MF-W 22:50, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Hello all. I was so busy recently. I have signed the both agreements.--Avocato (talk) 22:38, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  Hello. Waiting for @Jalexander-WMF: to give us the green light. —MarcoAurelio 23:17, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  Aye, Avocato has signed and can be left. พุทธามาตย์ can be removed, I'm going to email Bináris2 one more time. Jalexander--WMF 07:31, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  I have removed พุทธามาตย์'s right and also those of Octahedron80, who was the only remaining checkuser on th.wikipedia. Taketa (talk) 08:36, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]