Steward requests/Permissions: Difference between revisions

==== Username@xxproject ====
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- don't change this line -->
 |domain    = <!-- such as en.wikibooks -->
 |user name = 
 |discussion= 
}}
(your remarks) ~~~~

==== User name@xxproject ====
{{sr-request
  |status     = <!--don't change this line-->
  |domain     =
  |user name  =
  |discussion = 
}}

Administrator access[edit]

De-Invincible@ffwikipedia[edit]

Hello, I would like to request for a new permanent adminship right as my current 1 year adminship status on Fulfulde Wikipedia is expiring on 27/06/2024. Thank you for your help and considerations. De-Invincible (talk) 06:54, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 On hold until 1 July 2024. EPIC (talk) 14:18, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Granted for 1 year to expire on 2025-07-01. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks.

Note that ffwiki is not currently large enough for permanent admins, but I'm doing another one year term here. EPIC (talk) 16:51, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Flaverius@ndswiki[edit]

Hello everyone! The Low Saxon Wikipedia has no currently acitve administrator. The admin and bureaucrat Slomox last edit was 22. April 2023. The other Admin User:Iwoelbern wasn’t active since 03. December 2023.

I nominated myself as a admin (see above) to prevent vandalism, so that the small wiki team don’t need to look after that wiki and to get some maintenace work done, including moving pages back that were worngfully moved, editing protected pages etc.

After the three weeks period for votes is over now, I got one vote in favour from the only other active user at the moment Easfrisian. No one else participated. According to the nds.wiki-rules an admin needs three votes in total to be eleceted. Unforutnately there aren’t even three active users rightnow. I tried to reach out to the admins over e-Mail, but didn’t get any reaction.

Threfore I request temporary administrator status for the nds.wiki here. --Flaverius (talk) 10:47, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, like you mentioned, ndswiki has a bureaucrat. If possible we want to leave the task of adding administrators to local bureaucrats if there are any. I'm emailing them and will come back here in a week to process this if there has still been no response since then. EPIC (talk) 13:52, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cactusisme@bugwiki[edit]

Hi, I would like to apply as a temporary admin at bugwiki. The Wikipedia currently has 0 admins and I would be doing a lot of work there. I have submitted request at the community portal there. With this admin rights I would be able to fix the mess there as there is only a tiny portion of active editors there. This would also reduce the workload of the Small Wiki Monitoring Team. Hopefully this would be granted. Thank you. Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 10:24, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your account is a little more than a month old, and you currently have 4 edits on the project (all of them having been made today), as well as a CU block at one wiki. This needs internal discussion. In either case  On hold until 3 July 2024 as the discussion needs to be open for at least one week. EPIC (talk) 13:34, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 23:34, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What happens when no one participate? Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 12:42, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If there are no admins, things are handled by the global sysops. People can make requests here. Ternera (talk) 13:01, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Correct, but on a second note, generally requests sent to this page don't need participation but stewards can choose still decline some requests that have gotten no participation under some circumstances. EPIC (talk) 13:09, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh okay Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 00:05, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

One user whose account is two days old voted, I told the person his vote is not counted. Am I right? Thanks Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 10:27, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Generally, you are correct, but please also follow local voting requirements. Different projects may have different voting rules. MathXplore (talk) 12:51, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 00:27, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment hai Cactusisme saya melihat anda seorang pengguna baru, biasanya dalam proyek wikimedia indonesia minimal 3 bulan dan untuk suntingan bisa dikondisikan, kecuali memang sebelumnya anda aktif/dikenal sebelumnya di idwiki.
🍃Zulf🍃^talk 11:30, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Beberapa tahun yang lalu saya telah mengedit pada IP anonim, tetapi saya telah mengubah tempat tinggal saya sehingga tidak mengedit untuk beberapa waktu sekarang. Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 03:14, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment hi Cactusisme, I see you are a new user, usually on the Wikimedia Indonesia project for at least 3 months and edits can be conditional. unless you were previously active/known on IDwiki.
🍃Zulf🍃^talk 11:35, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose 🍃Zulf🍃^talk 11:42, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Elvonudinium@bxrwikipedia[edit]

Hi, I have been a temp admin on Buryat Wikipedia for many years, back from a hiatus now. There aren't that many active users at the moment, but the previous admin has supported my candidacy. There is no admin at the moment, and I expect there will be a need for an admin since google released their new Buryat machine translation tool.Edler von Udinium 12:47, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Granted for 1 year to expire on 2025-06-29. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks.

(Doing one year this time given that it's been some time since you last held the rights, but that you have held the rights several times in the past) EPIC (talk) 16:40, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Interface administrator access[edit]

Bureaucrat access[edit]

CheckUser access[edit]

Oversight access[edit]

Miscellaneous requests[edit]

Removal of access[edit]

Vito Genovese@trwiki[edit]

Posting here for transparency; as per Oversight policy#Removal of access, I have removed oversighter rights from Vito Genovese@trwiki as per more one year of global inactivity. Last edit at 2023-03-03 10:03, last logged action at 2023-03-02 20:57. EPIC (talk) 07:54, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, per my email exchange with EPIC, I am leaving this quick note to let the record show that I am actively on my account and in full control of it, just not editing at the moment. As the policy intends to prevent the risks associated with unattended accounts, I believe we are safe here. Additionally, the local policy to get the access is only through an RfO, something that I am not willing to go through at this time, so the removal would only serve to prevent my potential work on this front. I would therefore appreciate it if a reinstatement could be considered. Thank you!

Vito Genovese 18:43, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure whether the rights can be reinstated at this point; I will leave this to another steward. In the meantime I will place this request on hold to prevent archiving. EPIC (talk) 15:43, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciate it! I have a couple additional points that I would be happy to share with the steward that looks into this case, which I am not willing to share publicly. Please drop me a line if you see fit. Thank you!

Vito Genovese 18:44, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Access was correctly removed in accordance with policy. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:17, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JJMC89, thanks for weighing in. One point: I have never disputed the policy-compatibility of the action. It is unquestionably in line with the current wording. My plea is rather to go for the spirit of the policy, which I believe aims to tackle cases of account vulnerability that emerges when accounts with advanced rights do not get used or "deserted," if you will. In my case, however, I have been fully active (or, for the lack of a better term, online) but not editing due to reasons forcing this some time ago. The account has been safe all along.

The policy in question has slipped my mind, honestly, and had there been some sort of a notification or a reminder beforehand, I would certainly have taken action to prevent it. If I had edited a couple of days before the steward action, this was in fact going to be the case.

The reason I am asking for a reversion to be considered is that the current rules dictate that I would need to go through a fresh RfO on the local wiki, which is not an option at this point in time for reasons that are tied to me not editing at the moment. At the end of the day it becomes a mere technicality whether I had a chance to edit before the action or not, and in my opinion there is merit in following the spirit of the policy. There is nothing to gain from this otherwise.

Vito Genovese 13:05, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I know Vito Genovese from trwiki. To prevent his rights from being taken away from trwiki, he logs into his account once and disappears. He no longer cares about Wikipedia as much as he used to and has not used his rights on trwiki for a long time. The stewards did the right thing. 151.135.14.189 13:44, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Vito Genovese:, the problem with your line of reasoning is twofold: (i) others can make the same argument and (ii) once removed, stewards won't put it back except if it's a clear error. Not to mention that the whole point of an inactivity policy is to prelude inactive users - like yourself. Leaderboard (talk) 14:07, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pamputt@wikidata[edit]

Please remove the sysop and bureaucrat rights @wikidata for Pamputt due to inactivity according to policy at wikidata. User has made 0 sysop actions in the last six months (see log). --Lymantria (talk) 05:14, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Added link to local discussion (thread on noticeboard) --DannyS712 (talk) 08:38, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Done. --Mykola 13:15, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Steward requests
• Log of changes to user rights
• Log of global rights-related changes
• Steward handbook
• Users that have signed confidentiality agreement for nonpublic personal data
• Archives
  • 2004, 2005
  • 2006: 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12
  • 2007: 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12
  • 2008: 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12
  • 2009: 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12
  • 2010: 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12
  • 2011: 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12
  • 2012: 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12
  • 2013: 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12
  • 2014: 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12
  • 2015: 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12
  • 2016: 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12
  • 2017: 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12
  • 2018: 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12
  • 2019: 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12
  • 2020: 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12
  • 2021: 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12
  • 2022: 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12
  • 2023: 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12
  • 2024: 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12